Skip to main content

Security report for gatechnology.lv

GA technology · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GA technology is a Latvian company specializing in the sales and servicing of CNC machining equipment, targeting industrial clients requiring advanced metal processing machinery. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence built on WordPress, featuring detailed product categories and service offerings including 24-hour technical support for local clients. The technical infrastructure leverages common web technologies such as jQuery, UIkit, and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and published privacy policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, posing a moderate risk in trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gatechnology.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and technology sectors, focusing on CNC machinery sales and technical servicing. Its business model is B2B, serving industrial clients primarily in Latvia with regional extensions to Poland and Asia via subdomains. The firm emphasizes rapid service response and technical expertise as competitive advantages. Revenue streams likely include equipment sales, maintenance contracts, and consulting. The website's content and navigation support clear communication of offerings, targeting industrial manufacturers and machining businesses. Partnerships appear regional, with no evidence of large parent or subsidiary companies. Growth indicators include multilingual support and 24h service availability. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding compliance transparency and digital security to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and form validation in place. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are essential to mitigate common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is present, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns under GDPR and related regulations. Data collection via contact forms includes personal information and file uploads, but without visible consent mechanisms or data protection officer contacts. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires significant improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident readiness to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing data protection officer contact details and data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GA technology
Description
SIA GA technology offers quality technical servicing and sales of CNC machinery and related equipment, focusing on various machining centers and tools for metal processing.
Key services
Sales of CNC machining centers, Technical servicing and support, 24h service availability for Latvian clients, Consultation and technology advice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, MediaElement.js, UIkit, Bootstrap
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact forms.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy pages found; GDPR compliance unclear.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube.
  8. Popup contact form collects personal data including name, company, phone, email, comments, and file attachments.
  9. Site content is in Latvian with English alternate language links.
  10. Site targets industrial CNC machinery market in Latvia and nearby regions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, UIkit, Bootstrap, and MediaElement.js for multimedia support. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some heavy scripts and video elements that may impact load times. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears manageable but security-related technical improvements are needed to align with best practices and compliance requirements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gatechnology.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gatechnology.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.