Skip to main content

Security report for gate15.global

Gate 15 · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gate 15 is a specialized service provider offering a threat-informed, risk-based approach to analysis, resilience, and operations. The company targets organizations seeking to enhance their security posture and operational resilience through expert analysis and consulting services. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, indicating a standard CMS infrastructure with moderate digital maturity. The technical setup includes common libraries such as jQuery and FontAwesome, but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy policies. Security posture is basic with room for improvement in SSL configuration and security best practices. Overall, the site is accessible and professional but lacks depth in compliance and contact transparency, which impacts trust and credibility scores.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gate15.global

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gate 15 operates in a niche market focused on threat analysis and resilience consulting. The business model appears service-oriented, targeting clients requiring risk-based operational support. The website content is concise, indicating a small to medium-sized enterprise with a focused market position. There is no evidence of extensive partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business information and contact data limits visibility into revenue streams and growth indicators. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency and expanded digital presence to strengthen market positioning.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is enabled, but no advanced security headers were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were identified in the accessible content. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation to enhance trustworthiness and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels.
  5. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration to meet current best practices and improve site security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gate 15
Description
Gate 15 provides a threat-informed, risk-based approach to analysis, resilience, and operations.
Key services
threat-informed risk analysis, resilience consulting, operational support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is privacy protected with minimal public information.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the accessible content.
  5. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard JS libraries.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Content is professional but limited in depth and breadth.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Minimal tracking via Jetpack analytics.
  10. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, a popular and flexible framework. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags present. The site lacks advanced technical features such as structured data beyond minimal metadata or extensive use of modern JavaScript frameworks. There is no evidence of CDN or advanced hosting provider details. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gate15.global. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gate15.global.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.