Skip to main content

Security report for garysmithpartnership.com

Gary Smith Partnership · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gary Smith Partnership is a specialized consultancy focused on optimizing Salesforce implementations and empowering sales teams to enhance their performance. The company operates primarily in the technology sector, targeting sales organizations and Salesforce users. The website reflects a professional business consultancy with a consistent brand and good content quality. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing tools such as Yoast SEO Premium, Pardot, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager. The domain is well-registered and maintained with no privacy protection, indicating transparency and legitimacy. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally presented but could improve in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching garysmithpartnership.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche Salesforce consultancy with a focus on sales optimization. Its business model revolves around consulting and professional services, targeting sales teams and Salesforce users. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a small but established business founded in 2013. The use of marketing and analytics tools suggests an active approach to customer engagement and lead generation. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies on the main page may indicate these are located elsewhere or require enhancement. The domain registration and DNS setup are consistent with a legitimate business, and no suspicious patterns were detected. The company appears to maintain a focused market presence with a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain status flags to prevent unauthorized domain changes, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, suggesting room for improvement in HTTP security configurations. The site uses third-party marketing and analytics scripts, which require regular auditing to prevent vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which are important for mature security posture and compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  4. Add explicit contact information including security incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
08752110
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gary Smith Partnership
Description
Gary Smith Partnership is a consultancy focused on optimizing Salesforce implementations and empowering sales teams to improve performance and efficiency.
Key services
Salesforce optimization, Sales process improvement, Sales enablement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Cloudflare DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Pardot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Pardot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Pardot, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Pardot, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional consultancy site focused on Salesforce optimization.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO.
  3. Includes cookie consent banner with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet provided.
  6. Uses multiple analytics and marketing tools including Pardot, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows no privacy protection and domain is well maintained.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized platform. It uses Cloudflare DNS for performance and security benefits. Marketing and analytics tools include Pardot, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager, showing integration with enterprise marketing ecosystems. The site appears mobile optimized with good design and navigation. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of third-party scripts. No critical technical issues or errors were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be improved for enhanced security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with garysmithpartnership.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review garysmithpartnership.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.