Skip to main content

Security report for gartengottwerden.at

GALABAU VERBAND Österreich · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gartengottwerden.at serves as a platform promoting gardening and landscaping jobs in Austria, operated by the GALABAU VERBAND Österreich association. It targets job seekers interested in the gardening sector, offering job listings, company portraits, and a merchandise shop. The site is well-branded and consistent with its association identity, providing relevant content in German for the Austrian market. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging modern analytics tools like Matomo and Google Tag Manager, and implements a robust cookie consent mechanism via Klaro. The website is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices in place. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security or incident response policies. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the WHOIS data aligns well with the business, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in security posture and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gartengottwerden.at

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GALABAU VERBAND Österreich operates as a niche non-profit association focused on promoting careers in gardening and landscaping within Austria. Its business model centers on awareness, job placement facilitation, and community engagement through digital content and merchandise sales. The association maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, notably with galabau-verband.at, enhancing its credibility and reach. The target audience includes young professionals and job seekers interested in horticulture and landscaping trades. The website's content and social media presence support growth and engagement, although direct contact information is limited, which may impact lead generation. The organization appears stable and focused on sector promotion rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager introduces tracking but is managed with user consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the site's purpose but would benefit from enhanced header policies and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining data protection measures and incident response procedures to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including security or abuse email addresses to facilitate incident reporting and response.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by implementing CSRF tokens and input validation to prevent injection attacks.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
GALABAU VERBAND Österreich
Registration number
ZVR-Zahl: 797959443
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GALABAU VERBAND Österreich
Description
Bewirb dich jetzt um einen Job als Gartengott oder Gartengöttin.
Key services
Job listings, Company portraits, Job profiles, Merchandise shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Klaro Cookie Consent
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern cookie consent management.
  2. Strong social media presence across multiple platforms.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on main pages.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Good privacy and cookie compliance with clear user consent options.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; potential improvement area.
  8. Website content is in German and targeted at Austrian users.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a mature and widely used content management system, ensuring a solid technical foundation. It integrates Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics and Google Tag Manager for marketing tag management, alongside Facebook Pixel for retargeting. The site uses modern CSS and JavaScript assets, compressed and merged for performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. However, the lack of explicit security headers and limited visible hosting information suggest areas for technical hardening. Performance is moderate, with potential gains achievable through further optimization of assets and server configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gartengottwerden.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gartengottwerden.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.