Skip to main content

Security report for garnetstone.lv

Garnetstone Legal · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Garnetstone is a small law firm specializing in providing legal support to innovation-driven companies. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and a focused business description emphasizing support for innovative businesses. The technical infrastructure is based on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies and CDN hosting, resulting in moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and presentation suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the security posture is basic, with room for improvement in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching garnetstone.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention garnetstone.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for garnetstone.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche legal service provider targeting innovation-driven companies, likely startups and technology firms in Latvia. The business model revolves around specialized legal consulting and support services. The website content is concise and professional, but lacks detailed contact information and comprehensive legal policies, which could impact client trust. The firm appears to be small in size with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. The use of Tilda CMS suggests a focus on ease of content management and cost-effective web presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or extended service ecosystems from the website content.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and incident response contacts are missing. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are visible. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from enhanced security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and published incident response contacts to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  4. Obtain and display relevant security certifications or compliance statements to enhance trust.
  5. Monitor WHOIS data availability and ensure domain registration details are transparent and consistent with business identity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Garnetstone Legal
Description
A law firm built to support innovation-driven companies
Key services
Legal support for innovation-driven companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tilda CMS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tilda Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tilda Stats
Marketing tools
Tilda Stats
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed law firm site focused on innovation-driven companies.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and calls to action.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the main pages.
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie policy and terms of service are missing.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms; site content fully accessible.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses Tilda's CDN for hosting static assets, which supports moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. The site includes basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Accessibility features are basic but present, such as skip links. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site could improve performance and security by optimizing resource loading and implementing security best practices. The lack of visible security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with garnetstone.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review garnetstone.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.