Skip to main content

Security report for garden-gourmet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website garden-gourmet.com is currently a parked domain with no active business content or services. The domain is registered since 2019 with InterNetX GmbH and is set to expire in 2026. The site primarily serves as a landing page advertising the domain for sale, containing no privacy policies, contact information, or business details. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded iframes pointing to third-party ad and tracking domains. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which negatively impacts the security posture. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators and does not provide cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site has low trustworthiness and poor content quality, reflecting its status as a parked domain rather than an active business website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching garden-gourmet.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No active business operations or services are presented on the site. The domain is positioned as a generic domain for sale, targeting potential buyers rather than end consumers. There are no indications of a business model, revenue streams, or market positioning. The lack of contact information and business identity suggests no current operational presence. The domain's registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is typical for domains held for resale. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts and iframes. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not implement security best practices and exposes visitors to potential tracking risks. The domain registration is legitimate but the website itself offers no security assurances.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Add clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide verifiable contact information and business details to improve credibility.
  5. Reduce or control third-party tracking scripts and iframes to enhance user privacy and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This domain appears to be for sale and does not contain active business content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, iframe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
youstarsbuilding.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain landing page with no active business content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad and tracking scripts and iframes.
  5. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Domain registration is valid and consistent but site lacks content and trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple parked domain page primarily composed of static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It uses iframes to load external advertising content from domains such as youstarsbuilding.com and yfdpco2.com. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and does not appear optimized for SEO or accessibility. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS. Performance is moderate but could be improved by removing heavy third-party scripts. The hosting and DNS are managed by InterNetX GmbH and parkingcrew.net respectively, typical for parked domains. Overall, the technical implementation is minimal and focused on domain monetization rather than user experience or business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with garden-gourmet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review garden-gourmet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.