Skip to main content

Security report for gamingclub.com

Baytree Interactive Ltd · Other · Guernsey

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gaming Club is a well-established online casino platform operated by Baytree Interactive Ltd, licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission and certified by eCOGRA. The website offers a broad portfolio of casino games powered by Apricot software, including slots, blackjack, roulette, and live casino options. It targets online casino players seeking a secure, licensed, and feature-rich gambling experience with attractive bonuses and loyalty rewards. The site is multilingual and optimized for mobile use, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as AngularJS and jQuery, integrates Google Tag Manager and analytics tools, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit HTTP security headers are not detected. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is common in the gambling industry for privacy reasons but slightly reduces trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly online casino service.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gamingclub.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gaming Club operates in the online gambling sector with a business model focused on real money gaming, bonuses, and player retention through loyalty programs. The company leverages partnerships with software providers like Apricot and affiliate marketing through Buffalo Partners. Its market position is that of a legacy online casino with over two decades of experience, appealing to a global audience with multiple language options. Revenue streams likely include player deposits, game commissions, and affiliate marketing. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and trust signals such as licensing and certifications. The absence of direct contact information on the site suggests a focus on digital customer support channels. The partnership ecosystem includes software providers and affiliate networks, supporting growth and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and a robust cookie consent framework supporting GDPR compliance. Certifications from eCOGRA and licensing by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission further enhance trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS is a minor gap. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and support accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Registration number
69691
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baytree Interactive Ltd
Description
Gaming Club is an online casino offering a wide range of casino games including slots, blackjack, roulette, video poker, and live casino games. It provides bonuses, promotions, and a loyalty program. The casino is powered by Apricot software and licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission.
Key services
Online Slots, Online Blackjack, Online Roulette, Live Casino, Bonuses and Promotions, Loyalty Rewards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, AngularJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, ePrivacy Consent Framework
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web, Mobile
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies implied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, vtrk
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
src-play
Tracking pixels
vtrk
Marketing tools
vtrk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is rich and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on user privacy and cookie consent
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  5. Licensing and certification logos prominently displayed
  6. Multiple language options available
  7. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using AngularJS and jQuery, supported by Google Tag Manager and analytics tools for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred JavaScript to improve load times. The use of ePrivacy consent framework indicates attention to privacy compliance. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern but could be updated to newer frameworks for long-term maintainability. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online casino platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gamingclub.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gamingclub.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.