Skip to main content

Security report for gameanalytics.com

GameAnalytics · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GameAnalytics is a well-established SaaS provider specializing in analytics, advertising, and market intelligence solutions tailored for game developers and studios. The company positions itself as a leader in the gaming analytics space with over 14 years of experience and a large global user base. Their platform unifies game performance data, player behavior insights, and market intelligence to enable smarter decision-making across all stages of game development and operation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies, interactive content, and clear calls to action for demos and signups. Technically, the site leverages Webflow CMS, HubSpot forms, Google Tag Manager, and various advertising pixels, indicating a sophisticated marketing and analytics infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a positive user experience. Security is a key focus, with visible certifications including ISO 27001, SOC 2, KidSAFE+, and ePrivacy compliance. Forms incorporate Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise and GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms, demonstrating attention to privacy and data protection. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. While the website content and partner logos strongly suggest legitimacy, the missing domain registration details reduce confidence from a domain ownership perspective. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, relying instead on contact forms. Overall, the security posture is strong, but improvements in transparency and incident response contact publication are recommended. Strategically, GameAnalytics should address the WHOIS data gap to enhance trust, publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and consider adding direct contact details to improve business credibility and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gameanalytics.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GameAnalytics operates in the technology sector, focusing on providing analytics and market intelligence services to the gaming industry. Their business model is SaaS-based, targeting game developers, studios, and publishers globally. The company boasts a large customer base with over 100,000 studios served and a presence in 60 countries, indicating significant market penetration. Their competitive advantage lies in combining game performance data with advertising and market insights in a unified platform, supported by strong industry certifications and partnerships with major gaming companies like Meta and Ubisoft. The company emphasizes empowering smaller studios and VC-backed startups through tailored pricing plans. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, extensive documentation, and active customer engagement channels. The partnership ecosystem is robust, featuring well-known gaming and technology firms, enhancing credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The security posture of GameAnalytics is mature and well-structured. The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and integrates advanced security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2, which are industry standards for information security management and controls. Additional compliance with KidSAFE+ and ePrivacy regulations highlights their commitment to child safety and privacy laws. The use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on forms mitigates automated abuse and spam. Consent mechanisms for data processing and cookies align with GDPR requirements, indicating good privacy practices. However, the lack of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a gap in transparency and readiness. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Security headers are likely present but not explicitly confirmed, suggesting room for improvement in header policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish complete WHOIS registration details or clarify domain privacy protection to improve trust.
  2. Add a publicly accessible security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website for transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance security headers by explicitly setting X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options if not already configured.
  5. Consider adding direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GameAnalytics
Description
GameAnalytics is a top provider of analytics, advertising and market intelligence for game developers.
Key services
Analytics, Ad & Market Intelligence, Data Management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Forms, Lottie animations, Webflow CMS, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Bing Ads, Reddit Ads Pixel, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS/forms, Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on forms
  • ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications
  • KidSAFE+ and ePrivacy compliance
  • Consent mechanisms for cookies and data processing

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied), GameAnalytics own platform
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing Ads Pixel, Reddit Pixel, Iubenda Cookie Solution
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Iubenda
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features
  2. Strong emphasis on security certifications and compliance
  3. Multiple forms use HubSpot with GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form only
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. Clear business focus on game analytics and market intelligence
  8. Partner logos include major industry players indicating strong market position
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Webflow CMS, HubSpot for marketing and forms, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Lottie animations for interactive visuals. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow, providing reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The site is fully mobile responsive and incorporates accessibility best practices such as focus-visible outlines and semantic HTML. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. The use of multiple third-party marketing and tracking tools is balanced with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. Technical risks are minimal but include dependency on third-party services and the need for continuous monitoring of script vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gameanalytics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gameanalytics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.