Skip to main content

Security report for gallygardens.lv

Gally Gardens SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gally Gardens SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in garden landscaping and maintenance services, operating since 2009. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including lawn care, hedge installation, irrigation systems, and seasonal maintenance such as snow removal. The website positions the company as a local market player with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack with jQuery, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for analytics, hosted likely on a multiscreensite platform with CDN support. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though security headers and incident response information are absent. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust verification, but the website content and contact details appear legitimate and consistent with a professional small business. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy with room for security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gallygardens.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gallygardens.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gallygardens.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets residential and commercial property owners in Latvia seeking garden design and maintenance. Its business model is service-based with a broad portfolio of outdoor maintenance offerings. The firm has a decade-plus operational history, indicating experience and market presence. The website reflects consistent branding and provides clear contact channels including phone, email, and social media. The presence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance awareness. The company appears to maintain a moderate digital marketing and analytics footprint, leveraging Google and Snowplow analytics. There is a related partner domain (gallygardens.ltweb.lv) suggesting possible regional or service expansion. No certifications or formal trust badges are displayed, typical for a small local service provider.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting privacy compliance. However, no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or show blocking mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a security.txt file to provide vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact details.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider adding more trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials to boost business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gally Gardens SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gally Gardens SIA
Description
Piedāvā dažādus dārza labiekārtošanas un uzturēšanas pakalpojumus: dārza projektēšana, dzīvžogu ierīkošana un veidošana, augļu koku un krūmu veidošana un kopšana, teritoriju apsaimniekošana, paklājzāliena ieklāšana un zāliena kopšana, laistīšanas sistēmu ierīkošana
Key services
Bruģa seguma mazgāšana, Zāliena aerācija, Zāliena vertikulēšana, Zāliena pļaušana, Paklājzāliena ieklāšana, Augļu koku un krūmu veidošana un kopšana, Dzīvžogu ierīkošana un veidošana, Laistīšanas sistēmas ierīkošana, Dārza projektēšana, Jumtu un noteku tīrīšana no lapām un sniega
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Mapbox, Google Tag Manager, Photoswipe, Skrollr, FontAwesome, Roboto fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Clear business focus on garden landscaping and maintenance.
  3. Contact details and social media links are provided.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented.
  5. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable; limits domain trust verification.
  7. Modern JavaScript libraries and analytics used.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, Snowplow, and Mapbox for mapping services. It uses a multiscreensite.com platform with CDN-hosted assets for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and CSS. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS other than the multiscreensite platform is detected. The site uses standard fonts and icon libraries such as Roboto and FontAwesome. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gallygardens.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gallygardens.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.