Galerija ASNI is a small art gallery based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in showcasing emerging voices from the Baltic art scene. The website presents a professional and visually appealing platform built on Squarespace, featuring sections for artists, exhibitions, fairs, and contact information. The gallery targets art enthusiasts and collectors interested in contemporary Baltic art. Technically, the site leverages Squarespace's hosting and content management capabilities, with Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise integrated for form security. The website is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but could benefit from additional security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the active and professional website presence mitigates some risk. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention galerijaasni.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for galerijaasni.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Galerija ASNI operates as a niche regional art gallery focusing on Baltic emerging artists, positioning itself as a cultural hub for contemporary art in Latvia. The business model centers on exhibitions, artist representation, and participation in art fairs. The website's clear navigation and professional branding support its market positioning. The gallery maintains an active Instagram presence to engage its target audience. There is no evidence of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of public WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or registration issues, which should be monitored. The gallery's operations appear focused and specialized, with potential growth through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and HSTS headers, protecting data in transit. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on forms helps mitigate automated abuse. However, the site lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, representing a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and documented incident response processes.
Recommendations
Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
Provide clear incident response and security contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations to ensure no vulnerable libraries or tracking issues.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Galerija ASNI
Description
Galerija ASNI is an art gallery focused on emerging voices of the Baltic art scene, showcasing artists, exhibitions, and fairs.
Key services
Art exhibitions, Artist representation, Participation in art fairs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Squarespace, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
HSTS enabled
Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Marketing tools
Squarespace marketing automations
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is focused on Baltic art scene with clear navigation and professional design.
No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS but lacks some advanced headers.
No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its content management and hosting services. It employs modern web technologies and asynchronous loading of scripts, including Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection. The site uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization and includes structured data in JSON-LD format for SEO. Performance is moderate, with multiple compressed scripts and CDN usage. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical implementation is clean and maintainable, though SEO and accessibility could be further enhanced with additional metadata and ARIA attributes.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with galerijaasni.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galerijaasni.com.