Skip to main content

Security report for gaisakompresori.eu

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gaisakompresori.eu currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, blocking access to the actual business content. The page is designed to validate visitors as non-robots before granting access, indicating a security measure against automated attacks or suspicious traffic. No business-related content, contact information, or policies are accessible, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or market positioning. Technically, the site uses outdated CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are obsolete and pose significant security risks if still in use. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts indicates some level of visitor tracking and analytics, but no privacy or cookie policies are found to inform users about data collection. The site lacks visible security headers and HTTPS enforcement details in the provided data. From a security perspective, the use of BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge is a positive control to mitigate automated threats, but the outdated CMS references and lack of security headers suggest potential vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy compliance documentation and contact details further reduces trust and compliance posture. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal users due to the security challenge, and the lack of accessible business or compliance information results in a low trust and credibility score. Strategic improvements should focus on updating the CMS, implementing comprehensive security headers, establishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear business contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gaisakompresori.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the website being blocked by a security CAPTCHA, no direct business information or market positioning details are available. The domain is registered with SIA Area IT, a Latvian IT company, but no direct company name or business description is present on the site. The lack of contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service suggests the site may be inactive, under maintenance, or abandoned. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business model and target audience cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge to prevent automated malicious traffic, which is a strong security control. However, the detection of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags is a critical security concern, as these versions have known vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are visible, and HTTPS enforcement details are not provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate due to the CAPTCHA but weakened by outdated software and missing security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Update the CMS to the latest supported versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced across the entire website to secure data in transit.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide clear business contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking access to the actual site content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge
  2. No business content or contact information is accessible
  3. Outdated CMS meta tags indicate potential security risk or abandoned site
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  5. Uses Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA scripts
  6. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement details
  7. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found
  8. WHOIS registrar is SIA Area IT, a Latvian IT company
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and unsupported. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts shows some analytics integration. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The HTML structure is basic with inline CSS styles and no modern frameworks detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to the security challenge page. No hosting provider information is available. The technical debt is high due to outdated CMS references and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gaisakompresori.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gaisakompresori.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.