Skip to main content

Security report for gagroup.co

CO Internet S.A.S · Technology · Colombia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gagroup.co serves as a portal for searching and registering .CO domain names, operated by CO Internet S.A.S, a Colombian entity specializing in domain registration services. The site positions itself as a niche domain registrar focused on the .CO top-level domain, targeting individuals and businesses interested in securing .CO web addresses. The business model revolves around domain search and registration, leveraging partnerships with related internet service providers. The website content is basic but functional, with clear calls to action for domain search and links to official .CO resources. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. The performance is moderate with good mobile optimization, though accessibility and SEO features are basic. The site lacks advanced analytics or advertising scripts, suggesting a focus on core service delivery without aggressive marketing tracking. From a security perspective, the site does not explicitly confirm HTTPS usage or security headers in the provided data, which is a critical gap. No security policies or incident response contacts are published, and no cookie consent mechanism is present despite having a privacy policy. These factors reduce the overall security posture and privacy compliance rating. However, no vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content, and the domain registration details align well with the business, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is a legitimate domain registration service with a basic but consistent digital presence. Strategic improvements in security practices, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance trust and operational resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 12 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gagroup.co

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
35
DNS health
10
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CO Internet S.A.S operates in the domain registration sector, focusing exclusively on .CO domains, which positions it in a niche market with a clear target audience of businesses and individuals seeking Colombian domain names. The company leverages partnerships, such as with cointernet.com.co, to extend its service ecosystem. The business model is transactional, centered on domain search and registration services. The website's straightforward design and limited content suggest a focus on core functionality rather than broad marketing. Growth potential lies in expanding service offerings and improving digital trust signals. The lack of direct contact information on the site may limit customer engagement and support effectiveness.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. The absence of explicit HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a significant concern. No published security or incident response policies reduce transparency and preparedness. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism despite a privacy policy indicates partial GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, which is positive. To improve, the organization should implement robust SSL/TLS configurations, add security headers, publish security policies, and establish clear incident response contacts. These steps will enhance compliance, reduce risk, and build customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration across all pages.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Enhance contact transparency by providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers on the site.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CO Internet S.A.S
Description
The website provides domain search services specifically for .CO web addresses, promoting domain registration and availability.
Key services
Domain search, Domain registration
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, SVG
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is focused on .CO domain search and registration.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Privacy and terms policies are hosted on a related domain (go.co).
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the HTML content.
  7. Site uses modern React/Next.js framework but with basic content and design.
  8. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js framework, which supports server-side rendering and good performance optimization. The presence of preloaded fonts and asynchronous JavaScript loading indicates attention to performance. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, which could be improved. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. The site’s performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility. There is no evidence of technical debt or legacy technologies, suggesting a relatively modern and maintainable codebase. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO metadata, accessibility compliance, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gagroup.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gagroup.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.