Skip to main content

Security report for gagenmacdonald.com

Gagen MacDonald · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gagen MacDonald is a consulting firm specializing in human-focused transformation, emphasizing culture, communication, leadership, and design to improve employee experience. The company positions itself as a pioneer in this niche, targeting corporate clients seeking to transform their organizations through people-centric strategies. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging HubSpot CMS and various marketing and analytics tools to engage visitors and track performance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, but lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data is notable and may warrant further investigation, although the website's professional appearance and content suggest legitimate business operations. Overall, the website scores well in content quality, technical implementation, and security posture, with room for improvement in business credibility and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gagenmacdonald.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the consulting sector with a focus on organizational culture and transformation. Their business model revolves around providing expert consulting services to improve employee engagement and leadership effectiveness. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and high-quality content. The use of HubSpot for marketing and analytics suggests a strategic approach to lead generation and client engagement. The firm appears to have a strong market position as a pioneer in human-focused transformation consulting, with a broad range of services including M&A integration, digital transformation, and strategy execution. The lack of explicit company registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper business verification. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn supports professional networking and brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which may introduce moderate tracking but are industry standard. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information and implementing a security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gagen MacDonald
Description
Gagen MacDonald is a consulting firm that transforms companies by changing the employee experience through culture, communication, leadership and design.
Key services
Culture Change, Communication, Leadership, Design, Change & Transformation, Purpose, Employee Engagement, Strategy Execution, M&A Integration, Digital Transformation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only
  5. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools including HubSpot and LinkedIn
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  7. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as AOS for animations and Typekit for fonts. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and HubSpot Ads. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent indicates compliance with privacy regulations. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were observed. Opportunities exist to enhance technical SEO and accessibility further and to improve transparency around security and privacy practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gagenmacdonald.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gagenmacdonald.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.