Skip to main content

Security report for fzoeu.hr

Fond za zaštitu okoliša i energetsku učinkovitost · Government · Croatia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fond za zaštitu okoliša i energetsku učinkovitost is a Croatian governmental fund dedicated to environmental protection and energy efficiency. Established in 2004, it serves as a national authority providing funding, regulatory oversight, and public information related to waste management, renewable energy, and environmental sustainability. The website offers comprehensive resources including public tenders, announcements, and educational content targeting Croatian citizens, businesses, and public institutions. The organization maintains a consistent and professional online presence aligned with its governmental role. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking under a compliant cookie consent mechanism. Hosting and DNS services are supported by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features enhancing usability for diverse users. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks visible security policy documentation and incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the organization's Croatian governmental identity, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a secure, professional, and informative platform supporting the fund's mission. Strategic improvements include publishing explicit security policies, incident response information, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fzoeu.hr

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The fund holds a strong market position as a national governmental entity in Croatia focused on environmental and energy efficiency initiatives. Its business model revolves around public funding allocation, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement through public calls and information dissemination. The target audience includes Croatian citizens, businesses, and public institutions interested in sustainable development. Partnerships with multiple Croatian ministries and international organizations like UNIDO and the World Bank indicate a robust ecosystem supporting its operations. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with clear growth and impact in the environmental sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are important for transparency and readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The absence of advanced security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a governmental informational site but could be enhanced to meet higher standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fond za zaštitu okoliša i energetsku učinkovitost
Description
Croatian public fund focused on environmental protection and energy efficiency, providing funding, public calls, and information related to waste management, renewable energy, and environmental protection.
Key services
Funding for energy efficiency projects, Waste management programs, Environmental protection initiatives, Public tenders and calls, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Croatian governmental fund focused on environment and energy efficiency.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with multiple public calls and announcements.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Good use of HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No visible email addresses or phone numbers on homepage; contact form available.
  7. Use of Google Analytics for tracking with cookie consent.
  8. Multiple partner and related governmental domains linked.
  9. Accessibility features implemented with accessibility toolbar.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, contributing to reliable performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features such as font size adjustment and contrast modes. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities exist in adopting modern frameworks and enhancing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fzoeu.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fzoeu.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.