Skip to main content

Security report for futurefrontend.com

Future Frontend · Technology · Finland

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Future Frontend is a specialized conference series focused on frontend development, targeting senior developers and designers interested in emerging trends. The business operates primarily through annual events held in Finland, with workshops and networking opportunities. The website reflects a niche, quality-oriented event organizer with a clear focus on community and knowledge sharing. Technically, the site is built with modern web standards, leveraging Cloudflare for hosting and CDN, and uses JavaScript libraries such as Leaflet for maps. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futurefrontend.com

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a quality-focused, small-scale international conference organizer in the technology sector, specifically frontend development. Its competitive advantage lies in its curated single-track format and community atmosphere. Revenue likely derives from ticket sales and workshops. The target audience is senior developers and designers, with a significant international presence. The company maintains active social media channels and archives past events, enhancing credibility. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident. The business model is event-centric with potential for growth through expanded programming and sponsorships.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Cloudflare services, providing a baseline of security. Domain registration status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could be improved to enhance trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Future Frontend
Description
Future Frontend is a conference series bringing together developers in Helsinki, Finland to reimagine the future of frontend development. It focuses on current trends in frontend development and hosts annual events with workshops.
Key services
Frontend development conferences, Workshops, Networking events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Leaflet.js, Sidewind CSS utility, Cloudflare hosting and DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional conference site focused on frontend development.
  2. Content is well structured and informative with clear event details.
  3. No forms detected on main page; subscription and preregistration links lead to external or separate pages.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  5. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Security headers not explicitly detected in provided data; SSL is enabled.
  8. No vulnerability disclosures or security policies published.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a custom static site using modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It leverages Leaflet.js for interactive maps and Sidewind for utility-first CSS styling. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and availability. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or heavy frameworks detected, indicating low technical debt and ease of maintenance. Performance is fast with minimal external dependencies. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and well-suited for the business purpose.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurefrontend.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurefrontend.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.