Skip to main content

Security report for futurefarming.pl

Future Farming - Światowy dostawca jednostek technologicznych z zakresu nowoczesnego rolnictwa · Other · Poland

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Future Farming is a Polish-based online platform focused on delivering content and insights related to modern agricultural technologies and sustainable farming practices. The website serves as an information hub for farmers and agricultural professionals interested in innovations such as IoT, AI, precision agriculture, and sustainable methods. The platform positions itself as a global supplier of technological units in modern agriculture, primarily through educational and editorial content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with popular SEO and layout plugins, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and structure appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is functional and relevant for its niche audience but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futurefarming.pl

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche content publisher in the agricultural technology sector, targeting farmers and agribusiness professionals interested in modern farming solutions. Its business model revolves around content dissemination rather than direct product sales. The platform's market position is that of an educational and informational resource, with no evident commercial transactions on the homepage. The lack of explicit contact information and corporate details limits transparency. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked via the website. Growth potential lies in expanding content offerings and improving compliance to build trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap that should be addressed to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided HTML content. The login form uses password fields but lacks visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection. There is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels, which are important for handling security events. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Future Farming - Światowy dostawca jednostek technologicznych z zakresu nowoczesnego rolnictwa
Description
Future Farming is a global supplier of technological units in the field of modern agriculture, providing articles and insights on advanced farming technologies and sustainable agricultural practices.
Key services
Publishing articles on modern agriculture, Providing insights on agricultural technology, Educational content on sustainable farming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, All in One SEO plugin, td-composer plugin, td-standard-pack plugin, td-cloud-library plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form with password fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content on modern agriculture.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and layout.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins like All in One SEO and td-composer for layout and SEO optimization. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a content-focused WordPress site but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurefarming.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurefarming.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.