Skip to main content

Security report for futuralab.lv

SIA Sendito FuturaLab · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FuturaLab, legally identified as SIA Sendito FuturaLab, is a small local business based in Riga, Latvia. The company operates a professional website built on the Wix platform, indicating a focus on technology or business services. The website presents a clean and consistent brand image with clear contact information limited to a phone number and physical address. However, the absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Technically, the site uses modern Wix technologies and polyfills to ensure compatibility and moderate performance. Security measures include HTTPS and some JavaScript hardening, but lack of security headers and incident response contacts reduce the overall security posture. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futuralab.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small, essential entity operating in Latvia, likely providing technology or innovation-related services. The website targets a general audience with a straightforward service model. The lack of detailed service descriptions or partner domains limits deeper market positioning insights. The company does not display certifications or trust badges, which could enhance credibility. The Wix platform choice suggests a focus on ease of management and cost efficiency. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and some client-side security hardening scripts. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response contact or security email to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Consider adding trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or partner logos to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Sendito FuturaLab
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Sendito FuturaLab
Description
FuturaLab is a local business based in Riga, Latvia, operating at 1 Augšiela. The company appears to be a technology or innovation-focused entity, likely providing services or products related to technology or business development.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, core-js polyfills, focus-within-polyfill, Wix Thunderbolt framework
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security-related JavaScript overrides to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with professional design
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. Contact information limited to phone and address in structured data
  5. No email addresses or social media links explicitly found
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No incident response or security contact information found
  9. No certifications or trust badges visible
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix core scripts
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Thunderbolt framework and includes polyfills for legacy browser support. It loads resources from Wix's static and parastorage domains, indicating hosting and CDN services by Wix. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and CSS. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some focus ring styles and keyboard navigation support. SEO optimization is basic, with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata present but no advanced SEO schema beyond local business structured data. No analytics or tracking services were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futuralab.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futuralab.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.