Skip to main content

Security report for futour.com

FUTOUR GmbH · Other · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FUTOUR GmbH is a well-established German consultancy specializing in tourism and regional development with over 30 years of experience. The company offers a broad range of services including tourism concepts, regional management, feasibility studies, marketing consulting, and quality management. Their market position is strong within their niche, supported by multiple regional offices and a professional online presence. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Maps API and Google Fonts, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futour.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention futour.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for futour.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FUTOUR operates in the consulting sector focused on tourism and regional development, targeting municipalities, regional authorities, and tourism stakeholders. Their business model centers on providing tailored consulting and implementation services. The company demonstrates a stable market presence with a long domain history and multiple office locations. They maintain partnerships with service providers like Bytebetrieb GmbH for hosting and web development. Marketing efforts include newsletters and social media engagement. The company’s growth is supported by diverse project references and a comprehensive service portfolio.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, and security headers are not detected, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests limited formal security communication. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking footprint.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FUTOUR GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FUTOUR GmbH
Description
FUTOUR bietet seit 30 Jahren ganzheitliche Lösungen in Tourismus und Regionalentwicklung. Sie entwickeln innovative Konzepte und unterstützen bei der Umsetzung, mit Fokus auf Lebensqualität und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von Regionen, Städten und Gemeinden.
Key services
Tourismuskonzepte, Regionalentwicklung/Regionalmanagement, Machbarkeitsstudien & Evaluierungen, Angebots- und Themenentwicklung, Destinationsmanagement, Marketingkonzept/-beratung, Natur- und Kulturlandschaftsentwicklung, Qualitätsmanagement, Förderprogramm- und Wettbewerbsakquise, Moderation und Mediation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, Google Fonts (Roboto, Google Sans), JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CleverReach (newsletter)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German with professional business focus.
  3. Multiple office locations in Germany are listed with map integration.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Klaro.
  5. No phone numbers explicitly labeled found in the HTML content.
  6. Email contact info is provided: info@futour.com
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook link.
  8. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel used for tracking.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean and modern tech stack with Google Fonts and Google Maps API integration. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility basics. Hosting and DNS are managed through reputable providers, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. JavaScript is used for analytics and map functionality, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futour.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futour.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.