Skip to main content

Security report for fusonic.net

Fusonic GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fusonic GmbH is a medium-sized technology company based in Austria, specializing in software development and UX design with a strong regional presence in Vorarlberg. The company offers a broad range of digital services including software modernization, MVP development, service and process optimization, digital strategy consulting, data analysis, and artificial intelligence solutions. Their market position is supported by over 100 successful projects and long-term partnerships, targeting a wide audience including various industries. The website content is professionally presented with excellent design, clear navigation, and relevant business information. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Symfony and Angular, and is hosted behind Amazon CloudFront CDN, but suffers from a critical lack of valid SSL/TLS configuration, which severely impacts security posture. Security headers are partially implemented, but the absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols is a major vulnerability. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, and the use of Matomo analytics reflects privacy-conscious tracking. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fusonic.net

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fusonic GmbH operates in the technology sector with a focus on B2B software development and consulting. Their competitive advantage lies in their holistic approach to software development combined with UX design, enabling clients to modernize legacy systems and innovate with MVPs and AI integration. The company targets diverse industries and emphasizes long-term partnerships and quality delivery. Their digital presence is supported by a well-structured website with clear service offerings and client references. The company appears stable with a founding year of 2006 and a medium-sized team of over 30 experts. Their ecosystem includes social media engagement and a blog for thought leadership. No suspicious or conflicting domain relationships were found, indicating a focused and consistent business operation.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like XSS protection, frame options, and content type options are present, critical elements such as TLS protocol support, strong cipher suites, OCSP stapling, and session resumption are missing. There is no evidence of a formal security policy or incident response contact channels, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the lack of secure transport undermines overall data protection. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to improve security and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure the web server to support TLS 1.2 or higher with strong cipher suites and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption.
  3. Enhance HSTS header to include subdomains and preload directive to enforce strict transport security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve transparency.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and conduct vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
  7. Maintain consistent branding and content updates to reinforce trust and professionalism.
  8. Consider accessibility improvements to enhance usability for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fusonic GmbH
VAT number
ATU65001856
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including nginx web server, PHP with Symfony framework, Angular frontend, and Blazor and .NET technologies. It uses the Sulu CMS version 2.6.5 and is served via Amazon CloudFront CDN. Despite the modern stack, the site suffers from poor SSL/TLS implementation, which is a critical technical debt. Performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential issues with performance monitoring or reporting. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data for local business and FAQ schema. The use of Matomo analytics shows a preference for privacy-friendly tracking solutions. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fusonic.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fusonic.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.