Skip to main content

Security report for funlapp.pw

Other · Philippines

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FunLapp is an adult content forum platform primarily focused on sharing images and videos categorized under sections such as 'Beautiful Little Models', 'VIP Section', and 'Forbidden and Secret Section'. The site targets an adult audience interested in niche media content. The business model revolves around forum-based community engagement with restricted access to VIP and secret content. The domain is newly registered in 2024 with privacy protection, typical for adult content sites, and hosted via MyBB forum software with jQuery libraries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching funlapp.pw

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in a niche adult entertainment market, leveraging a forum structure to engage users. It lacks clear business identity or official company information, which is common in this sector. The site links extensively to similar adult-themed partner domains, indicating a networked ecosystem. The business model likely relies on membership or VIP access monetization. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data. The partnership ecosystem is broad but informal, based on external adult content sites.

Security posture

The security posture is weak, with no HTTPS/SSL encryption, absence of security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies. Forms exist but lack visible security measures. The domain uses privacy protection, which is justified given the adult content nature. No incident response or security contact information is provided. These gaps expose users to potential data interception and reduce trustworthiness. The site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and clear privacy policies to improve security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Establish clear contact channels for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures to enhance incident response readiness.
  5. Improve website professionalism and trust indicators by providing verified contact information and business details.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online forum platform hosting multiple categories related to image sets and videos, including sections labeled as 'Beautiful Little Models', 'VIP Section', and 'Forbidden and Secret Section'. The site appears to target users interested in specific media content.
Key services
Forum discussions, Media sharing (images and videos), VIP and secret content access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
MyBB, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content forum with multiple categories for images and videos.
  2. No HTTPS detected; all content served over HTTP.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No security headers or modern security practices observed.
  5. Multiple external links to similar adult-themed domains.
  6. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and recent registration.
  7. Site uses MyBB forum software with jQuery.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Contact available only via contact form and login/register pages.
  10. No social media or official company contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the MyBB forum platform using jQuery libraries, hosted on servers indicated by alexhost.md nameservers. The site serves content over HTTP without SSL, impacting security and SEO. The design is basic with moderate performance and limited mobile optimization. No modern SEO or accessibility features are evident. The technical debt includes lack of HTTPS, missing security headers, and absence of privacy compliance mechanisms. Modernization opportunities include migrating to HTTPS, enhancing mobile responsiveness, and implementing SEO best practices to improve user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with funlapp.pw. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review funlapp.pw.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.