Skip to main content

Security report for funerarycones.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.funerarycones.com is a Japanese language affiliate marketing site focused on hair removal salons and clinics in Tokushima, Japan. It provides rankings, recommendations, and affiliate links to popular salons such as MUSEE, TBC, and Lacoco. The site targets consumers seeking hair removal services locally and monetizes through affiliate partnerships. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including a third-party tracking script from Research Artisan Pro. It lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows basic mobile optimization and SEO. Security posture is minimal with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or privacy policies present. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a significant concern, impacting trust and legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professional security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching funerarycones.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention funerarycones.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for funerarycones.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in a niche local market providing informational content and affiliate marketing for hair removal salons in Tokushima. Its business model relies on affiliate commissions from salon referrals. The content is basic but relevant to the target audience. The site lacks direct business contact information or corporate identity, suggesting a small-scale or individual operator. External links indicate partnerships with affiliate networks. Growth potential depends on SEO and affiliate marketing effectiveness. The lack of transparency and WHOIS data may limit trust and partnership opportunities.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. While HTTPS is implemented, no security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are present. No privacy or cookie policies are provided, indicating poor compliance with GDPR or similar regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available. The site uses third-party tracking scripts without clear user consent mechanisms. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the site is vulnerable to common web security risks and lacks governance controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website provides rankings and recommendations for hair removal (脱毛) esthetic salons and clinics in Tokushima, Japan. It features popular salons like ミュゼ (MUSEE), TBC, and ラココ (Lacoco), highlighting their services, pricing, and benefits.
Key services
Hair removal salon rankings, Affiliate links to salons, Informational content on hair removal
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Research Artisan Pro tracking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Affiliate network via t.afi-b.com
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Affiliate marketing links
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Japanese focused on hair removal salons in Tokushima.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Affiliate marketing is the primary business model.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is used but no advanced security measures.
  6. No CMS or major frameworks detected; appears to be a static or simple site.
  7. External links mostly to affiliate and related topical sites.
  8. Tracking via Research Artisan Pro script is present.
  9. No social media links or company branding beyond header image.
  10. WHOIS data missing, domain legitimacy questionable.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic static HTML with linked CSS and JavaScript. It includes a third-party tracking script from Research Artisan Pro for analytics. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance appears moderate with no explicit optimization techniques observed. The absence of security headers and privacy controls indicates technical debt in security and compliance. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with funerarycones.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review funerarycones.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.