Skip to main content

Security report for fundermax.at

Fundermax GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundermax GmbH is a large Austrian manufacturer specializing in high-quality wood-based materials and compact laminates used in interior and exterior design applications. The company offers a diverse portfolio including raw chipboard, coated chipboard, laminate panels, compact panels, and biofiber panels, targeting architects, designers, and manufacturers. Their website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with multiple industry certifications and awards, indicating a strong market position. Technically, the site is built on Pimcore CMS with Bootstrap framework and integrates modern tools like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management. However, the website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, which significantly impacts its security posture. While security headers are present, the absence of a valid HTTPS setup and explicit security or incident response policies are notable gaps. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but requires urgent attention to its SSL configuration and security policy transparency to enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fundermax.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fundermax operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on wood-based and laminate materials for various applications. The company leverages a digital delivery program to streamline product selection, indicating a mature digital strategy. Their market positioning is reinforced by multiple certifications and awards, suggesting a commitment to quality and sustainability. The website's extensive navigation and multilingual support reflect a global or European market focus. Partnerships, such as with valantic.com for site development, indicate a robust ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests a preference for controlled customer interactions via forms or login portals. The business model centers on product manufacturing and distribution with a strong emphasis on brand trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently limited by the lack of a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no active HTTPS support despite the presence of HSTS headers in the HTTP response. Security headers like X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are correctly implemented, enhancing protection against common web attacks. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response information, and secure contact channels reduces transparency and preparedness. The use of modern frameworks and cookie consent tools indicates some level of security awareness, but the critical SSL issue must be addressed immediately to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and improve security posture.
  2. Enable and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce secure connections.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies, including dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Add explicit, verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and ensure all forms use secure submission methods.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Pimcore CMS and Bootstrap 4.1.3, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management. The site features a comprehensive, multi-level navigation structure and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. However, performance metrics are missing, indicating a lack of performance monitoring or optimization. The invalid SSL certificate is a critical technical flaw impacting security and user trust. The site is hosted on an Apache server with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires improvements in security and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fundermax.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fundermax.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.