Skip to main content

Security report for fujitsu.com

Fujitsu · Technology · Japan

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fujitsu is a well-established global technology company specializing in sustainability transformation and digital innovation. The website presents a comprehensive portfolio of services including consulting, business applications, network services, cyber security, and cloud solutions targeting multiple industries such as finance, manufacturing, energy, and public sector. The company positions itself as a leader in driving net positive impact through technology. Technically, the website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks like Bootstrap 4 and jQuery, hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. However, the site suffers from a critical security flaw: the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and disabled HTTPS protocols, severely impacting its security posture. Security headers are present but insufficient to compensate for the lack of encryption. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, and contact information is available primarily via email and contact forms. Overall, the site is professionally designed with excellent content quality and user experience but requires urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fujitsu.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fujitsu.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fujitsu operates as an enterprise-level technology services provider with a mature domain and strong brand presence. Its business model focuses on B2B services that enable digital and sustainability transformations across diverse sectors including energy, transportation, finance, manufacturing, and public sector. The company leverages thought leadership content, case studies, and active newsroom updates to engage its target audience of business leaders and enterprises. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking tools like Pardot and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature marketing ecosystem. The domain registration data aligns well with the company's history and legitimacy, supporting trust in its operations.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently poor due to the lack of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and disabled HTTPS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to interception and data compromise. While security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and X-Frame-Options are implemented, they cannot mitigate the fundamental risk of unencrypted traffic. The domain has a strict DMARC policy with reject, indicating good email security practices. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. Immediate action is required to install and maintain valid SSL certificates and enable modern TLS protocols to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 4 and several JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, GSAP, Vivus, and ScrollMagic to deliver a rich user experience. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, inferred from HTTP headers. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Accessibility and mobile optimization are good, with skip links and responsive design elements. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential issues with load time measurement or optimization. The lack of a valid SSL certificate is a major technical risk that undermines the overall infrastructure quality.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100 +1Medium26 findingsView report
  2. 72/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fujitsu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fujitsu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.