Skip to main content

Security report for en.fuckupnights.com

Fuckup Nights · Other · Mexico

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fuckup Nights is a global movement focused on transforming societal perceptions of failure by creating impactful events, workshops, and content that foster psychological safety, vulnerability, and innovation. The organization operates in over 150 cities across 42 countries, serving both individuals and enterprises with public events and private corporate experiences. Their business model revolves around event organization, licensing, and content creation to promote learning from failure as a growth tool. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Tippy.js, and integrates analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts, but the absence of visible security headers and formal privacy compliance documentation indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which slightly impacts trust but is likely justified given the organization's global and community-driven nature. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front with strong branding and community engagement, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and security hardening to align with best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching en.fuckupnights.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fuckup Nights holds a strong market position as a global community and event organizer focused on destigmatizing failure. Their competitive advantage lies in their unique storytelling format and psychological safety emphasis, appealing to both individuals and corporate clients. Revenue streams likely include event ticket sales, corporate workshops, and city licensing fees. The target customer segments include entrepreneurs, professionals, and organizations seeking innovative learning experiences. Growth indicators include extensive city presence and a large attendee base. Partnerships with corporate clients and active social media presence support their ecosystem. Operationally, the organization demonstrates maturity in digital engagement but could enhance compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture shows a baseline maturity with HTTPS enforced and no evident exposure of sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which may hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no clear cookie consent or GDPR statements, posing potential regulatory risks. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools is standard but requires transparent user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears nascent and would benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance with data protection regulations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform periodic security assessments to maintain a secure and inclusive user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fuckup Nights
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fuckup Nights
Description
Fuckup Nights es un movimiento global enfocado en crear experiencias que deconstruyan la percepción de fracaso de la sociedad. Cuestionamos los sistemas de opresión para construir espacios de seguridad psicológica, generando vulnerabilidad, innovación y conversaciones difíciles pero necesarias.
Key services
Eventos públicos de Fuckup Nights, Eventos privados y talleres para empresas, Licencias para organizar eventos en ciudades, Contenido multimedia (videos, blogs), Experiencias corporativas de seguridad psicológica
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Webflow CMS, Swiper.js, Tippy.js, Typeform, Weglot (translation)
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Hotjar scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Typeform, Weglot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Spanish.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy or unregistered domain.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Multiple contact forms embedded via Typeform.
  5. Strong social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content.
  9. Content is professionally presented and consistent with brand.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries for UI components and interactivity. It integrates multiple analytics and user behavior tracking services asynchronously to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete privacy documentation indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting details are not explicit, but the use of Webflow suggests managed hosting. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility compliance to further enhance user experience and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with en.fuckupnights.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review en.fuckupnights.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.