Skip to main content

Security report for fuckmyindiangf.com

Yellowplum Limited · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fuckmyindiangf.com operates as an adult entertainment platform specializing in Indian/desi girlfriend themed pornographic content. It offers videos, photos, and membership access targeting adult users only, with explicit age warnings and disclaimers. The business is small scale, operated under Yellowplum Limited, and has been active since 2011, indicating a stable presence in its niche market. The site uses basic web technologies including Bootstrap and Google Analytics for tracking, hosted on MojoHost infrastructure. However, the technical implementation is basic with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and does not implement DNSSEC, which exposes it to potential risks. There is no visible cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanism, which is a compliance gap especially for users in regulated regions. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting transparency and trust. The domain registration is consistent and stable, but the overall security posture is weak. Overall, the site presents significant risks related to security and privacy compliance, with a low trustworthiness rating. The content is clearly adult in nature, restricting the audience to adults only. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and user trust mechanisms are recommended to enhance the site's credibility and reduce risk exposure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fuckmyindiangf.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche adult entertainment market focusing on Indian/desi girlfriend themed content. Its business model revolves around subscription-based access to explicit videos and photos. The company, Yellowplum Limited, has maintained the domain since 2011, indicating longevity. The market position is specialized but limited in scale, with no visible partnerships beyond related domains. Revenue streams likely include membership fees and possibly affiliate marketing. The lack of visible contact or support channels suggests a low emphasis on customer engagement. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the data. The company targets adult consumers seeking niche adult content, with a straightforward content delivery approach.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak. It lacks HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing domain security. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating low maturity in security governance. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates extensive user tracking without visible privacy controls. The absence of cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms further highlights compliance gaps. Overall, the site is vulnerable to security threats and regulatory non-compliance, posing risks to both users and the business.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  4. Introduce a comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Publish clear contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Yellowplum Limited
Description
Indian GF porn videos & xxx videos and photos. Indian GF are sexy, willing to pop your cork in any way. Desi GF leaked mms, xxx movies & porno videos.
Key services
Adult porn videos, Photos, Membership access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is adult content focused with explicit material and age gating.
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers for business or support.
  3. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  4. Basic website design with limited SEO and accessibility features.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking user behavior.
  6. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business age.
  7. No advanced security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected in provided data.
  8. Multiple related domains exist with similar naming conventions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user tracking. Hosting is provided by MojoHost, as indicated by DNS servers. The site lacks a CMS, suggesting static or custom-built pages. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving accessibility, and enhancing SEO with structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fuckmyindiangf.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fuckmyindiangf.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.