Skip to main content

Security report for fstudio.lv

Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fstudio.lv is a Latvian photography studio website offering photo studio rental and photography services. The site targets photographers and clients seeking professional studio spaces in Latvia. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on studio rental and related photography services. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure including common plugins and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good design and navigation but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no advanced security headers or WAF detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fstudio.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a local photography studio service provider in Latvia, offering studio rental and photography services. The website content is well-structured and targets photographers and clients in need of studio spaces. The presence of gift cards indicates additional revenue streams. The company appears small in size with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The partnership with macart.lv is noted but its nature is unclear. The business ecosystem is limited but focused. Growth indicators and competitive positioning are not explicitly stated but the site maintains a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google Analytics tracking with opt-out functionality. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No WAF or anti-bot protections are detected, increasing exposure to common web threats. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Deploy a Web Application Firewall or security plugin to protect against common attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to latest secure versions.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
fstudio.lv is a photography studio website offering rental of photo studios and photography services. It features galleries of studio spaces and pricing information.
Key services
Photo studio rental, Photography services, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.5.32, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights, Magnific Popup, Isotope, RoyalSlider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics opt-out mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based photography studio site in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  6. Google Analytics tracking is implemented with opt-out functionality.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
  9. Site uses multiple JavaScript libraries and plugins for UI and media handling.
  10. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 4.5.32 with a variety of plugins including Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights for Google Analytics, and several UI libraries such as jQuery, Isotope, and RoyalSlider. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. SEO is basic with canonical tags and RSS feeds but no structured data or Open Graph metadata found. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider is not identified from the content. The site lacks modern security configurations and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt and areas for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fstudio.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fstudio.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.