Skip to main content

Security report for fsts.lt

Other · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fsts.lt is a basic WordPress site primarily using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin. The site content is minimal and appears to be a placeholder or under development, with no visible contact information, privacy policies, or security disclosures. The WHOIS data for the domain is inaccessible due to query limits, preventing verification of domain ownership and registration details. Technically, the site uses standard web fonts and plugins but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The overall security posture is weak due to missing security best practices and lack of visible incident response or data protection policies. The site does not exhibit signs of active tracking or advertising. Given the limited content and lack of transparency, the risk level is moderate to high, and improvements in security, privacy, and business credibility are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fsts.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind fsts.lt is not clearly identifiable from the website content or metadata. The site is in Lithuanian and uses a common WordPress setup with multilingual support, suggesting an intent to serve a local or regional audience. However, no company name, contact details, or business descriptions are provided, limiting insights into market positioning or business model. The lack of trust indicators and minimal content suggest the site may be in early development or not actively maintained. No partnerships or related domains are evident from the data.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic and lacks several important controls. HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from canonical URLs), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. No forms with visible anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces transparency and trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the site would benefit from a comprehensive security review and implementation of standard security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish contact channels for security incidents and vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS query limit exceeded message indicates blocking of WHOIS data. No WAF challenge detected in HTML content but WHOIS data is inaccessible due to query limits. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Just another WordPress site
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, SitePress Multilingual CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic WordPress site using Divi theme with minimal content.
  2. No visible contact information or privacy/cookie policies found.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit exceeded, preventing domain ownership verification.
  4. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  7. Site uses Google Fonts and Yoast SEO plugin.
  8. No forms with identifiable fields found in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Site content is minimal and mostly placeholder text.
  10. No social media links or company emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard content management setup. It loads Google Fonts from external domains and includes multilingual support via SitePress Multilingual CMS. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of caching or CDN usage. The WHOIS data is blocked due to query limits, limiting domain registration insights. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information is detected. The site would benefit from improved technical SEO, accessibility, and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fsts.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fsts.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.