Skip to main content

Security report for fsjelgava.lv

Futbols skola Jelgava · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FS Jelgava is a local football school based in Jelgava, Latvia, providing football training for children and youth starting from four years old. The organization operates a website built on Squarespace, featuring a modern design, active blog/news updates, and social media integration across Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok. The site is secured with HTTPS and HSTS, and includes a cookie consent banner indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages suggests room for improvement in compliance documentation. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence for a small sports education entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fsjelgava.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FS Jelgava operates in the sports education sector, focusing on youth football training. The business model centers on providing year-round football coaching and team participation in local competitions. The website content and social media presence indicate an engaged community and active communication. The organization appears to be a small-sized local entity without visible parent or subsidiary companies. Partnerships include local sponsors such as zazatimber.lv. The business targets children and youth in Jelgava and surrounding areas, positioning itself as a key local football training provider.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with HSTS, which is a strong security baseline. However, it lacks additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy page is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a security or incident response policy page and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Attempt to retrieve and verify WHOIS data to confirm domain legitimacy and registration details.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Futbols skola Jelgava
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Futbols skola Jelgava
Description
Futbola skola Jelgava uzņem bērnus un jauniešus- zēnus un meitenes futbola nodarbībās sākot ar četru gadu vecumu. Treniņi bērniem notiek cauru gadu mūsdienīgā infrastruktūrā.
Key services
Football training for boys and girls starting from 4 years old, Year-round training in modern infrastructure, Football team participation in competitions, Events and news updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, Squarespace JavaScript libraries
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a sports school site focused on football training in Jelgava, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian and English with clear navigation and active blog/news section.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok.
  4. Uses Squarespace CMS and hosting with SSL and HSTS enabled.
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing its standard JavaScript libraries, Typekit fonts, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, typical for Squarespace-hosted sites. The technical implementation is modern and stable, but there is an opportunity to improve accessibility and security header coverage. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. Hosting and CMS are provided by Squarespace, ensuring reliable uptime and infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fsjelgava.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fsjelgava.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.