Skip to main content

Security report for frujo.cz

FRUJO, a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FRUJO, a.s. is a Czech-based manufacturer specializing in the production of food components such as fruit, vegetable, and other ingredient bases for various sectors of the food industry including dairy, bakery, and beverage industries. The company holds recognized certifications like IFS and BIO, indicating a commitment to quality and compliance. Their website is multilingual, targeting an international audience, and offers an e-commerce platform for related products. The business model focuses on supplying high-quality components to food manufacturers, supported by a professional online presence and clear contact information. Technically, the website is built on the aPilot CMS platform and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Leady tracking. It employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for security, with a cookie consent mechanism indicating some level of privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, providing a good user experience. From a security perspective, while HTTPS and reCAPTCHA are implemented, explicit security headers and a public security policy or incident response contacts are missing. No WHOIS data was retrievable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact the legitimacy of the business as presented on the site. Overall, FRUJO presents a professional and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy policy publication. The risk level is moderate, primarily due to the lack of WHOIS data and some missing security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frujo.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FRUJO operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on food ingredient components. Their market positioning is that of an established, quality-certified supplier with a diversified product portfolio serving multiple food industry verticals. The company leverages multiple brands and subsidiaries to target niche markets such as bakery and sauces. Their revenue streams likely include direct sales through an e-shop and B2B supply contracts. The target customers are food manufacturers requiring specialized components. The website's multilingual support and certifications suggest a strategy aimed at both domestic and international markets. Partnerships with related brand domains indicate a structured brand ecosystem. Growth indicators include product innovation and a dedicated farmer product line. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining certifications and expanding digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by the cookie consent banner but lacks a clear privacy policy. Incident response readiness is not evident. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a medium-sized manufacturing business but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FRUJO, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FRUJO, a.s.
Description
Výroba potravinářských komponentů pro různá odvětví potravinářského průmyslu. Profesionální přístup, moderní trendy a technologie, flexibilní servis.
Key services
Production of fruit components, Production of vegetable components, Emulsions, bases, concentrates, Non-fruit components, Powder mixtures, BIO products, Farmer products, E-shop for related products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, aPilot CMS, Leady tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Site uses modern tracking and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Certifications such as IFS and BIO are prominently mentioned.
  8. Multiple language options available indicating international audience.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the aPilot CMS platform and uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with multiple CSS and JS resources loaded asynchronously. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence with opportunities for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frujo.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frujo.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.