Skip to main content

Security report for frontliners.net

BuyDomains.com · Technology · United States

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BuyDomains.com operates as a domain marketplace specializing in premium domain sales, exemplified by the landing page for frontliners.net. The business targets individuals and companies seeking valuable domain investments, positioning itself as a trusted intermediary in the domain acquisition process. The website presents a professional interface with clear calls to action for purchasing domains, supported by contact phone numbers and integrated marketing tools.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frontliners.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a business model focused on domain brokerage and sales, generating revenue through domain transactions. Its market position is that of an established player in the domain marketplace sector, catering to a global audience. The use of Eloqua marketing forms and Google Tag Manager indicates a mature marketing ecosystem. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance and user trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements a Content Security Policy, enhancing its security posture. Integration of Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from automated abuse. However, the lack of visible privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. The WHOIS data absence raises minor concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, security practices are solid but could be improved with enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies prominently on the website to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner or mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking technologies.
  3. Provide clear security and incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying security certifications or trust badges to enhance user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BuyDomains.com
Description
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Key services
Domain name sales, Domain brokerage, Domain search and acquisition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS 1.8.2, Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Google Tag Manager, Web Workers, Eloqua marketing forms
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Eloqua marketing forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain marketplace landing page for frontliners.net domain sale
  2. No WHOIS data available for www.buydomains.com domain
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on landing page
  4. Contact phone numbers and contact form present
  5. Uses AngularJS 1.8.2 and Google services for analytics and captcha
  6. Security headers present but robots meta tags disallow indexing
  7. No social media links or emails explicitly found
  8. No visible certifications or security policies
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on AngularJS 1.8.2, utilizing modern web technologies such as Web Workers and Google services for analytics and bot protection. The technical implementation includes asynchronous script loading and a Content Security Policy to mitigate XSS risks. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic, partly due to robots meta tags disallowing indexing, likely intentional for domain sale landing pages. Accessibility features are minimal and could be enhanced.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frontliners.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frontliners.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.