Skip to main content

Security report for frontierfiltration.com

Frontier Filtration International Limited · Manufacturing · Ireland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Frontier Filtration International Limited is a small Irish company specializing in industrial filtration solutions including dust filtration, filter maintenance, emission monitoring, and filter design and supply. The company targets industrial clients requiring specialized filtration services, positioning itself as a one-stop filtration service provider with a focus on Irish and international markets. The website is built on an older WordPress platform with several plugins and uses jQuery 1.9.1, indicating a need for modernization. The site is accessible with clear navigation and professional design but lacks advanced mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no HTTPS issues detected but outdated software versions and missing security headers present risks. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms & conditions present but no cookie consent mechanism despite use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, reducing trustworthiness and suggesting further verification is needed. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires updates to improve security, privacy compliance, and technical infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frontierfiltration.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and energy sectors, providing filtration products and services primarily to industrial clients. Its business model is B2B, focusing on product supply, maintenance, and monitoring services. The website indicates a niche market position with a focus on Irish and international clients. The presence of a LinkedIn profile suggests some level of professional networking. The lack of detailed company registration and VAT information on the site limits transparency. The company appears to have a stable but small market presence with opportunities for growth through enhanced digital presence and security improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied but no explicit security headers detected. The use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms despite tracking scripts indicates partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is functional but requires urgent updates to software and implementation of security best practices to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Upgrade jQuery to a current supported version to avoid security risks.
  3. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance fully.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Frontier Filtration International Limited
Description
Frontier Filtration International Limited offers comprehensive filtration solutions including dust filtration, air conditioning filters, filter problem solving, filter maintenance, cement and silo filters, filter spares, cartridges, and emission monitoring services. The company aims to be a one-stop solution for filtration needs with expertise in inspection, maintenance, and design of filter units.
Key services
Filter Design & Supply, Dust Monitoring, Inspections and Reports, Filter Problem Solving, Filter Maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, WordPress 3.7.39, Yoast SEO plugin, Meteor Slides plugin, PrettyPhoto plugin, cforms plugin, jCarousel
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL with https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on industrial filtration services with clear navigation and professional design.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  4. No email addresses found in the HTML content; contact is via phone and contact form only.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking scripts.
  6. Use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions pose security risks.
  7. Privacy policy and terms & conditions pages are present but basic.
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn link.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 3.7.39, which is significantly outdated, running jQuery 1.9.1 and several plugins such as Yoast SEO, Meteor Slides, PrettyPhoto, and cforms. The site uses JavaScript-based tracking via Google Analytics and Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. The HTML structure is valid but could benefit from modernization and responsive design improvements. The lack of modern security headers and outdated software versions present technical risks. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization to improve security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frontierfiltration.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frontierfiltration.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.