Skip to main content

Security report for frieslandcampinaingredients.com

FrieslandCampina Ingredients · Manufacturing · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FrieslandCampina Ingredients is a globally recognized supplier of dairy-based ingredients, serving the food and beverage manufacturing sectors with a strong emphasis on innovation and sustainability. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Gravity Forms and WP Rocket, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures including HTTPS and multiple security headers are properly implemented, contributing to a robust security posture. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which should be further investigated to confirm authenticity. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supporting strong privacy practices. Overall, the website demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness, with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frieslandcampinaingredients.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a B2B supplier within the manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on dairy ingredients. It holds a strong market position as part of the Royal FrieslandCampina group, leveraging certifications like ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 to reinforce quality and safety. The business model centers on supplying ingredients and innovation services to food manufacturers worldwide. The website targets industry professionals and ingredient buyers, providing detailed product information and contact channels. The digital ecosystem is well-maintained, with clear branding and consistent messaging. Partnerships and parent company relationships are evident, supporting credibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Forms are implemented using Gravity Forms, a reputable plugin with security features. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. However, the lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that could impact trust. Enhancing security communication and publishing a security.txt file would improve the security culture and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact details to improve transparency and security readiness.
  2. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to confirm domain legitimacy and enhance trust.
  3. Implement a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating security headers and SSL configurations to uphold a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FrieslandCampina Ingredients
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FrieslandCampina Ingredients
Description
FrieslandCampina Ingredients is a global supplier of dairy-based ingredients for the food and beverage industry, focusing on innovation, quality, and sustainability.
Key services
Dairy ingredient supply, Product innovation, Sustainability consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, FontAwesome, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Foundation CSS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Gravity Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant to dairy ingredient manufacturing and supply.
  3. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  4. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  5. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including forms, emails, and phone numbers.
  8. No visible advertising or tracking beyond necessary marketing tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern front-end frameworks like Foundation CSS and performance optimization tools such as WP Rocket. It employs Gravity Forms for data collection, ensuring structured and secure form handling. FontAwesome is used for iconography, enhancing visual appeal. The site demonstrates fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for incremental improvements in accessibility and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frieslandcampinaingredients.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frieslandcampinaingredients.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.