Skip to main content

Security report for frens.ee

Other · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

26/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website frens.ee currently serves only a 404 Page Not Found error page with no active business content or user engagement features. The domain is registered with Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar, since 2010, indicating a legitimate and aged domain. However, the lack of content and absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies suggest the site is inactive or a placeholder. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with minimal security headers, notably a weak Content-Security-Policy allowing 'unsafe-inline' scripts, which reduces security effectiveness. No HTTPS status was explicitly provided, but the domain status is 'ok' and presumably supports HTTPS given the registrar and hosting provider. No analytics, tracking, or social media integrations are present, indicating minimal digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to missing standard headers and lack of secure forms or incident response information. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility, reflecting its inactive state.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frens.ee

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
26

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of business content, no clear market positioning, business model, or key services can be identified. The domain is Estonian and registered by a local registrar, suggesting a local or regional focus if active. No contact information or trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are present. The site does not currently engage in marketing, analytics, or advertising activities. The lack of business data and minimal content implies the domain may be unused or under redevelopment.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal with only a Content-Security-Policy header present, which is weakened by allowing 'unsafe-inline' scripts. No other security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, or Referrer-Policy are detected. No forms or input fields exist to evaluate secure data handling. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain uses a reputable registrar and hosting provider, which supports baseline trust, but the website itself lacks active security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Improve Content-Security-Policy to disallow 'unsafe-inline' scripts to enhance protection against XSS attacks.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration if not already done.
  3. Add standard security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Develop and publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website currently serves a 404 Page Not Found error with no active business content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  4. Minimal technical security headers present; CSP is weak due to 'unsafe-inline'.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No social media or external business links found except registrar name servers.
  7. Domain is registered with a reputable Estonian registrar and is over 13 years old.
  8. Website appears inactive or placeholder with no business or security information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static HTML page serving a 404 error message with no dynamic content or CMS detected. The tech stack is basic with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the registrar. The site shows basic mobile responsiveness but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. No analytics or third-party scripts are present, indicating minimal technical complexity. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content. The site would benefit from modernization and improved technical implementation to support business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frens.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frens.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.