Skip to main content

Security report for freewebpush.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website freewebpush.com appears to be a minimal landing page related to web push notification services, as suggested by the domain name and the brief welcome message. The site lacks detailed business descriptions, contact information, or legal policies, which limits the ability to fully assess its market position or business model. The domain is moderately aged, registered since 2016 with GoDaddy, and uses DNS servers from machteam.ro, indicating some level of operational infrastructure. Technically, the site employs common web technologies such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and FontAwesome icons. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and no visible HTTPS information suggests a weak security posture. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms but provides minimal content and no user interaction elements such as forms. From a security perspective, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, no contact or incident response information, and missing security best practices reduce trust and compliance levels. The use of tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance negatively. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, security, and privacy compliance, indicating it may be a placeholder or early-stage service site. Strategically, the site requires significant improvements in transparency, security, and content to enhance trustworthiness and compliance. Implementing HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, adding contact information, and improving content quality would be critical next steps.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching freewebpush.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention freewebpush.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for freewebpush.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind freewebpush.com likely operates in the technology sector, focusing on web push notification services. The domain age and registrar suggest a legitimate registration, but the lack of detailed business information, contact details, or legal disclosures limits insight into its market positioning or revenue model. The target audience is presumably website owners or developers seeking push notification solutions. The absence of partner or subsidiary domains and minimal content suggests a small-scale or early-stage operation. No certifications or trust indicators are present, which may impact competitive advantage and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security posture of freewebpush.com is weak. The absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and no explicit HTTPS information indicates potential vulnerabilities. The site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking without visible consent or privacy policies, raising compliance concerns. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. While no explicit vulnerabilities or malware are detected, the lack of security best practices and transparency poses risks to user data protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance considerations.
  4. Add clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  5. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be related to web push notifications services, inferred from the domain name freewebpush.com and minimal content 'Welcome to Webpush.com!'. No detailed business description is present.
Key services
web push notification service
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and lacks critical pages such as privacy policy, terms of service, or contact information.
  2. No forms or user input fields detected.
  3. No social media or company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information provided; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Domain is moderately aged and registered with a known registrar.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Website appears to be a placeholder or minimal landing page for a web push notification service.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and FontAwesome icons. The HTML is minimal and lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. DNS is managed via machteam.ro nameservers, while the domain is registered with GoDaddy. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The site lacks forms or interactive elements, reducing complexity but also limiting functionality. Technical debt appears low but modernization and security enhancements are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with freewebpush.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review freewebpush.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.