Skip to main content

Security report for freepro.com

Free Pro · Telecommunications · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Free Pro is a French B2B telecommunications and IT services provider, a subsidiary of Groupe iliad, offering a broad portfolio of fixed and mobile telecom products and cloud/managed IT solutions tailored for enterprises of all sizes. The company positions itself as a trusted partner delivering expertise, competitive pricing, and proximity service across France with multiple regional offices. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern analytics and consent management tools, but suffers from a critical lack of valid SSL/TLS configuration, impacting security posture. While DNS email security is well configured with SPF and DMARC, the absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes the site to risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching freepro.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
95
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Free Pro leverages its parent company's brand and infrastructure to serve a large enterprise market in France, with over 70,000 clients and a doubling revenue in under two years. Its business model focuses on providing simple yet innovative telecom and cloud solutions, targeting IT and technical decision-makers. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem including Broadcom and VMware, enhancing its cloud offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with good SEO and accessibility but reveals opportunities for performance optimization. The strategic focus on sovereignty, flexibility, and trust aligns with market demands for secure and reliable IT services.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with critical gaps. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols is a major vulnerability, potentially exposing users to interception and undermining trust. DNS-based email security is robust, reducing phishing risks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site uses modern consent management and analytics tools compliant with GDPR, but the absence of security headers and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate immediately to enable HTTPS and secure all communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and 1.3) and disable deprecated versions to strengthen encryption.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  6. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a tech stack including jQuery, Matomo analytics, Didomi consent management, and caching via W3 Total Cache. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with Pojo Accessibility plugin. Performance is suboptimal with a load time exceeding 12 seconds and a large page size near 900 KB, indicating potential for optimization. Hosting appears to be managed via AS30781 network with dedicated nameservers. SEO is enhanced by structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. Technical risks include outdated SSL configuration and missing security headers, which could impact business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with freepro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review freepro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.