Skip to main content

Security report for fragmat.eu

Fragmat · Manufacturing · Slovenia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fragmat is a medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in insulation solutions for modern construction and related industries. The company holds a leading market position in Slovenia and is recognized across Europe for its high-quality thermal insulation, waterproofing, radiant heating, and packaging products. The website reflects a professional business with clear product offerings and references to significant projects, targeting construction professionals and industry clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers and explicit security policies are absent. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is typical for European domains and justified for this business type. No suspicious patterns were found. Contact information is transparent and consistent with the company brand. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, Fragmat's digital presence is solid, supporting its business credibility and market position. Security and privacy practices are adequate but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fragmat.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fragmat operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on insulation and construction materials. Its business model revolves around product development, manufacturing, and distribution to construction and architectural markets. The company leverages a strong European market presence and emphasizes quality and innovation. The website content and references to projects indicate a stable and reputable business with a clear target audience of construction professionals. The use of multiple language versions suggests a strategy to serve diverse European markets. No direct revenue streams or partnerships are explicitly disclosed on the website. The company maintains a professional online presence with consistent branding and trust signals such as references and contact transparency. The lack of visible certifications or security policies suggests areas for business process improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices such as no exposed sensitive data and secure forms. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party scripts for analytics and marketing is evident, but no vulnerabilities were detected in these components. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fragmat
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fragmat
Description
We are experts in insulation and a comprehensive provider of high-quality insulation product lines for diverse needs of modern construction and other industries.
Key services
Thermal insulation products, Waterproofing materials, Radiant heating systems, Packaging and technical products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support
  3. Strong focus on insulation and construction industry products and solutions
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools with privacy considerations
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information on the site
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses jQuery for client-side scripting. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fragmat.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fragmat.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.