Skip to main content

Security report for fpagentura.eu

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fpagentura.eu currently serves as a security challenge page using BitNinja's CAPTCHA mechanism to block automated or suspicious visitors. It does not present any business or marketing content, indicating the domain is either under protection or not actively used for public business purposes. The page uses outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are known to have security vulnerabilities, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. The technical infrastructure includes Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for bot mitigation and visitor tracking. Security posture is moderate due to the CAPTCHA protection but weakened by outdated software and lack of visible security headers. Overall, the site is low in business credibility and privacy compliance, with limited content quality and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fpagentura.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No explicit business information, company details, or contact information is available on the site. The domain is registered via SIA Area IT, a Latvian registrar, but no registrant organization details are provided. The lack of accessible business content and policies suggests the domain is not currently used for active commercial operations or is in a protective state. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The target audience is general internet users who are being filtered for security reasons.

Security posture

The site employs BitNinja's greylist CAPTCHA to prevent automated access, which is a positive security control. However, the use of outdated CMS versions introduces significant risk of exploitation. No security headers are detected, and HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the data. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA and analytics scripts indicates some level of security and monitoring. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, indicating immature security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires urgent updates and improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade Joomla and WordPress CMS to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with valid SSL/TLS certificates.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Provide visible and verified contact information and incident response channels.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and remove any unnecessary or outdated libraries.
  7. Improve website content and user experience to support business credibility.
  8. Consider implementing a comprehensive vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The page is a security challenge page using BitNinja's greylist CAPTCHA to block automated or suspicious traffic. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This website page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated or malicious traffic and verify visitors are human. It does not contain business or product information.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Analytics, BitNinja security service
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated access
  • IP greylisting and delisting mechanism via BitNinja

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge page blocking access to actual content.
  2. No business or marketing content is accessible on this page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or company details are provided.
  5. CMS versions detected are outdated and vulnerable.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts are present for tracking.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement details visible in provided data.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected.
  9. WAF detection confirmed: BitNinja greylist CAPTCHA.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are outdated and unsupported, posing security risks. The page is a minimal CAPTCHA challenge with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Google reCAPTCHA v2 is integrated for bot mitigation, and Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility optimizations. Performance is moderate given the minimal content but could be improved with updated technologies and better mobile optimization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fpagentura.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fpagentura.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.