Skip to main content

Security report for foxtrotmarketing.com

Foxtrot Marketing Group · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foxtrot Marketing Group is a woman-owned and led business specializing in branded merchandise and custom e-commerce platform solutions. With a legacy of 50 years, they provide in-house design, production, and fulfillment services tailored to businesses seeking to enhance their brand presence through custom merchandise. Their market position is strengthened by a focus on customization, seamless e-commerce experiences, and strong client partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Gravity Forms, integrating modern analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, offering a professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers and policies are lacking. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is missing, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the website content and branding are consistent and professional. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy business front with room for improvement in security transparency and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxtrotmarketing.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B clients needing branded merchandise and e-commerce solutions, leveraging decades of experience and in-house capabilities to differentiate from competitors. Their business model focuses on providing end-to-end services including design, production, and fulfillment, supported by a customizable online store platform. The presence of testimonials and social media links indicates active client engagement and marketing efforts. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled lead capture via forms. The company appears medium-sized with a strong emphasis on brand consistency and customer satisfaction. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website's content quality and branding consistency support a high level of business credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes modern analytics and marketing scripts, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The site would benefit from implementing additional security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism, which may pose regulatory risks in some jurisdictions.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foxtrot Marketing Group
Description
Foxtrot Marketing Group is your partner in creating branded merchandise and launching a branded online store for building your company's brand value.
Key services
Branded merchandise production, Custom e-commerce platform hosting, Fulfillment, On-demand printing, Kitting, In-house design and production
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive forms
  2. No explicit privacy cookie consent mechanism detected
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or new registration
  4. Strong branding and customer testimonials present
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. Contact available only via form, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Gravity Forms for data collection. It uses Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility features are basic but present. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. The site lacks some advanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms, which should be addressed to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxtrotmarketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxtrotmarketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.