Skip to main content

Security report for forward-site.com

Ministry of Communication and Information Technology of the Republic of Indonesia · Government · Indonesia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website forward-site.com currently serves as a government-mandated block notification page operated by the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. It informs visitors that access to the requested site is denied due to violations of Indonesian laws and regulations. The site provides links to the official Trustpositif database and normalization request forms, targeting a general audience including website owners and the public. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap for styling and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which also provides analytics. The site is mobile responsive but offers minimal content and lacks privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. Security posture is weak with no detected security headers or explicit policies. WHOIS data shows a suspicious future domain creation date, raising legitimacy concerns about the domain registration, though the website content and branding are consistent with an official government block page. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but limited in content and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forward-site.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government regulatory function focused on enforcing content compliance under Indonesian law. It provides public notification of blocked websites and facilitates access to the Trustpositif database and normalization requests. The business model is regulatory enforcement and public information dissemination. The site targets website owners and the general public in Indonesia. The domain registration data is inconsistent with the website's operational status, which may indicate administrative or data errors. The site does not engage in commercial activities, advertising, or user data collection beyond minimal analytics. Partnerships appear limited to official government entities. The site’s market position is authoritative within the Indonesian government regulatory framework.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is minimal. The site is served over HTTPS via Cloudflare, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There are no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not collect user input or personal data, reducing attack surface, but also lacks transparency on data protection. The WHOIS data anomaly (future domain creation date) is a concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is low risk due to limited functionality but would benefit from improved security headers, clear privacy policies, and verified domain registration data.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and correct WHOIS domain registration data to ensure legitimacy and trust.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The website content is a government-mandated block page served via Cloudflare, indicating access is blocked due to content violations. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Ministry of Communication and Information Technology of the Republic of Indonesia
Description
The website serves as a government notification page indicating that the requested website is blocked by the Indonesian government due to content violations of Indonesian laws and regulations.
Key services
Website blocking notification, Access to Trust+ database, Normalization request submission
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Cloudflare
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a government mandated block notification page
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No forms or user input fields present
  4. Contact emails provided for negative content and PSE registration complaints
  5. No phone numbers or physical addresses found
  6. No social media links present
  7. Uses Bootstrap for styling and Cloudflare for hosting and analytics
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies detected
  9. Content is minimal and focused on legal blocking notice
  10. WHOIS data contains suspicious future creation date
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap CSS framework and is hosted behind Cloudflare, which provides DNS, CDN, and analytics services. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. The site lacks SEO optimization and meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing complexity. The use of Cloudflare Insights indicates some level of traffic monitoring. The domain uses Cloudflare nameservers but has a suspicious WHOIS creation date in the future, which is a technical anomaly requiring investigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forward-site.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forward-site.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.