Skip to main content

Security report for fortytwo.io

Fortytwo · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fortytwo is a cybersecurity and compliance service provider offering consulting and risk management solutions to businesses. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance. The technical infrastructure leverages modern analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics, and LinkedIn Insight, with appropriate consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and some security headers present, though there is room for improvement in CSP implementation and incident response transparency. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common in this sector but reduces transparency. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with moderate technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fortytwo.io

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fortytwo targets businesses seeking cybersecurity and compliance solutions, positioning itself as a niche provider in the technology sector. The business model is B2B consulting and compliance management. The website content and branding are consistent and relevant to its market. The use of modern marketing and analytics tools indicates an active approach to customer engagement and lead generation. However, the lack of direct contact information and WHOIS transparency may impact perceived credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes some security headers, indicating a baseline security posture. The presence of scripts to harden fetch and XHR requests shows attention to security best practices. Cookie consent and privacy policies are well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a security.txt file and incident response contact information limits the site's readiness for vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content Security Policy to enhance protection against XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve vulnerability disclosure processes.
  3. Add visible and verified company contact information to increase business credibility and trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Expand SEO metadata and structured data to improve search engine visibility and indexing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fortytwo
Description
Fortytwo provides cybersecurity and compliance services, focusing on helping businesses manage security risks and regulatory requirements.
Key services
Cybersecurity consulting, Compliance management, Risk assessment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Plausible Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Security scripts to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Plausible Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Plausible Analytics, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Leadfeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website built on Wix platform with professional design.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response info.
  5. Uses modern analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's content delivery and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, including Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics, with asynchronous loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Some legacy polyfills are included for browser compatibility. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. The technical stack is modern but constrained by the Wix platform's limitations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fortytwo.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fortytwo.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.