Skip to main content

Security report for fortemix.cz

Fortemix, s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fortemix, s.r.o. is a Czech-based manufacturer specializing in cement-based industrial flooring systems and PVC flooring solutions for industrial and commercial use. Established since 1991, the company has a strong market presence across Europe and the USA, offering a diverse product portfolio including cement mixtures, self-leveling compounds, coatings, and PVC tiles. Their website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with multilingual support and comprehensive product information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics integrations, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and CAPTCHA-protected forms, though additional security headers and a published security policy would enhance trust. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Fortemix demonstrates a credible and trustworthy business with a mature digital infrastructure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fortemix.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fortemix.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fortemix.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fortemix operates in the manufacturing sector, targeting industrial and commercial customers, architects, and project designers. Their business model focuses on product innovation and reliable supply of specialized flooring materials. The company leverages partnerships with reputable brands and maintains a client section for enhanced customer service. The presence of multilingual content and EU-related subsidy information indicates active engagement in European markets. Trust indicators such as client testimonials, partner logos, and GDPR compliance support their market credibility. The lack of publicly available WHOIS data is typical for privacy-conscious businesses and does not detract from their legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses CAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam and abuse. However, it lacks several recommended security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which is a gap in transparency. The use of outdated jQuery versions may pose potential vulnerabilities if not regularly patched. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhancements in header policies and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update privacy and cookie policies as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fortemix, s.r.o.
Description
Výroba cementových průmyslových podlahových systémů a PVC podlah s industriálním i komerčním využitím. Společnost je rodinnou firmou s druhou generací vedení, působící v Evropě a USA.
Key services
Cementové vsypové směsi, PVC dlažba, Samonivelační stěrky, Nátěry na cementové podlahy, Potěry na cementové bázi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Hotjar, Gravity Forms, Popup Maker, Responsive Lightbox, AddToAny
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
imedia.cz, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Yandex Metrika, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Popup Maker, AddToAny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Multiple language versions available (cs, en, pl, de).
  3. Strong presence of product and application information.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection.
  8. Good GDPR and cookie compliance observed.
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.7.2, utilizing a range of plugins for SEO (Yoast), forms (Gravity Forms), popups (Popup Maker), and analytics (Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Hotjar). The tech stack is modern but includes legacy jQuery 1.12.4, which should be updated. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The presence of multiple external scripts and tracking services indicates a mature marketing infrastructure but requires ongoing privacy compliance management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fortemix.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fortemix.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.