Skip to main content

Security report for fort-royer-oleron.fr

Association du Site ostréicole et naturel de Fort-Royer · Other · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Association du Site ostréicole et naturel de Fort-Royer, a small non-profit organization dedicated to preserving and promoting the oyster farming heritage and natural environment of Fort-Royer in Oléron, France. The site offers educational workshops, public animations, and guided visits to a unique oyster farming village located within a national nature reserve. The association has been active for over 30 years, consistent with the domain registration dating back to 2010. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using the Neve theme and several plugins including MetaSlider and Contact Form 7. It is hosted by a reputable provider (1&1 Internet SARL) and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some technical improvements are recommended such as adding security headers and properly configuring analytics. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. No security policies or incident response contacts are published, and no security.txt file is present. The Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating minimal user tracking. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, serving a niche eco-tourism and cultural heritage audience. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fort-royer-oleron.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fort-royer-oleron.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fort-royer-oleron.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in a niche market focused on cultural heritage preservation and eco-tourism related to oyster farming in Oléron, France. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique location within a national nature reserve and its authentic traditional oyster farming village. The business model is non-profit, relying on public visits, educational workshops, and community support. The target customers include tourists, families, and schools interested in nature and traditional oyster farming. The website indicates active partnerships and community involvement but no commercial subsidiaries. Growth potential is linked to eco-tourism trends and educational outreach. The association maintains a consistent brand and clear communication, reinforcing its market position as a trusted local heritage site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness. The Google Analytics plugin is present but inactive, minimizing privacy risks from tracking. No GDPR compliance documentation is found, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit site but could be improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Configure or remove unused Google Analytics plugin to clarify data collection practices.
  4. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Association du Site ostréicole et naturel de Fort-Royer
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Association du Site ostréicole et naturel de Fort-Royer
Description
The website represents a traditional oyster farming village and natural site called Fort-Royer located in Oléron, France. The association preserves the site, promotes oyster farming heritage, and offers public animations and educational workshops.
Key services
Oyster farming site visits, Public animations and events, Educational workshops for schools, Conservation and heritage preservation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, MetaSlider plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Neve WordPress theme, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent
  4. No security.txt or incident response info found
  5. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  7. Site uses modern WordPress theme and plugins
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source
  9. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is active
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using version 6.8.3 with a well-maintained theme (Neve) and popular plugins such as MetaSlider and Contact Form 7. The hosting provider is reputable, and HTTPS is properly configured. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site uses Google Fonts and jQuery 3.7.1. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The site could benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance documentation to reduce technical debt and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fort-royer-oleron.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fort-royer-oleron.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.