Skip to main content

Security report for forschungsdatenzentrum.de

Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the Länder · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the Länder operates as an official government entity providing access to German official microdata for scientific research. The website serves researchers and statisticians by offering various data supply options, clear terms of use, and user support. The business model is government-funded with user charges for data access. The site is well-branded and consistent with government standards. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, uses Matomo for analytics with privacy-conscious configurations, and includes modern JavaScript libraries such as Hyphenopoly. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and security headers are not evident. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe, with a high legitimacy score. Strategic improvements include publishing a formal security policy, incident response contacts, and adding security.txt for vulnerability disclosure to enhance transparency and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forschungsdatenzentrum.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forschungsdatenzentrum.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forschungsdatenzentrum.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Research Data Centre holds a strong market position as the official German government provider of statistical microdata. Its competitive advantage lies in exclusive access to official data and legal frameworks regulating data use. The business model relies on government operation with user fees for data access. Target customers are academic and scientific researchers requiring official microdata. Growth indicators include ongoing data updates and user satisfaction surveys. The partnership ecosystem includes federal and state statistical offices. The operation is stable with consistent branding and clear communication.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and privacy-focused analytics. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed data were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and security.txt file indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers are not visible, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. The site respects GDPR requirements with clear privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be elevated with formal documentation and additional headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal security policy page outlining security controls and governance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools for security compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Research Data Centre of the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the Länder
Description
The Research Data Centre provides access to official microdata from German statistics for scientific research. It offers various data supply options, including public use files, scientific use files, and remote access. The centre supports data users with terms of use, access requests, and user charges. It is operated by the Federal Statistical Office and the statistical offices of the German federal states.
Key services
Provision of official microdata, Data access management, User support and consultation, Safe centre online booking, Newsletter and publications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Hyphenopoly.js
Frameworks
Drupal 10
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with disableCookies and requireConsent in Matomo
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, government-related, and focused on research data provision.
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. No security policy or incident response info publicly available.
  5. Uses Drupal CMS and Matomo analytics with privacy-conscious settings.
  6. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple physical addresses and contacts.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS, a modern and secure content management system. It employs Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies and require consent, reflecting privacy awareness. The use of Hyphenopoly.js indicates attention to text hyphenation and readability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with no major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Hosting details are not explicit, but domain name servers are from a domain discount provider, which is common for government domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forschungsdatenzentrum.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forschungsdatenzentrum.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.