Skip to main content

Security report for forschung-fachhochschulen.de

Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Forschung an Fachhochschulen' is an official German government platform managed by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). It serves as an information hub for research activities at universities of applied sciences (HAW) in Germany, providing news, funding opportunities, project details, and service information. The site targets researchers, academic institutions, and policymakers interested in applied research. The business model is government-funded dissemination and promotion of research programs. The site maintains a good level of content quality, professional design, and consistent branding, reinforcing its authoritative position in the government research sector. Technically, the website is built using the Government Site Builder CMS, with a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It is hosted likely by ITZBund, a federal IT service provider, and shows good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site uses Matomo analytics with anonymized data collection and a clear cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating good privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent for tracking. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data shows partial consistency with the government affiliation, with no suspicious patterns. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and formal incident response information. The overall risk assessment is low, with the site being trustworthy and professionally maintained. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and providing clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forschung-fachhochschulen.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forschung-fachhochschulen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forschung-fachhochschulen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a government-funded research promotion program focused on applied sciences in Germany. It holds a strong market position as an official information source backed by the BMBF and GWK. The business model revolves around disseminating research program information and facilitating funding opportunities. The target audience includes academic researchers, universities of applied sciences, and government stakeholders. The site shows growth indicators through regular news updates and event announcements. Partnerships with government bodies and research institutions are evident. The platform operates with a clear focus on transparency, accessibility, and compliance, supporting the German research ecosystem effectively.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented with anonymized tracking via Matomo. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no visible incident response or security policy published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. GDPR compliance is well addressed through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site demonstrates a security-aware culture but would benefit from formalizing security policies and enhancing technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance monitoring and auditing of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are introduced.
  5. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent mechanisms to comply with evolving privacy regulations and user expectations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt
Description
Website for the research program 'Forschung an Fachhochschulen' supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the Joint Science Conference (GWK). It provides information about research at universities of applied sciences (HAW), funding opportunities, projects, news, and events.
Key services
Information dissemination about research at Fachhochschulen, Funding program details and application guidance, News and event updates, Contact and support services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Government Site Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in for statistics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German with an English language option.
  3. Clear cookie consent mechanism with detailed information.
  4. No terms of service page found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed in the HTML content.
  7. Contact email info@forschung-fachhochschulen.de is present.
  8. Social media sharing links for Facebook and Twitter are included.
  9. Website uses Government Site Builder CMS.
  10. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a government-specific CMS called Government Site Builder, which provides structured content management tailored for public sector needs. The tech stack is standard with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, ensuring compatibility and responsiveness. The site loads with moderate speed and is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility standards. SEO is well implemented with meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears to be managed by ITZBund, a federal IT service provider, ensuring reliable infrastructure. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable technologies. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance incident response capabilities to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forschung-fachhochschulen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forschung-fachhochschulen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.