Skip to main content

Security report for forsafeworship.org

United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) · Government · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website forsafeworship.org represents the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC) initiative titled '#forSafeWorship - UN Plan of Action to Safeguard Religious Sites'. It serves as a platform to advocate for the protection and respect of religious sites worldwide, emphasizing peace and harmony. The target audience includes global communities, religious groups, governments, and peace organizations. The site operates as a non-profit advocacy platform under the United Nations umbrella, with a small organizational size and a founding year of 2020. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, hosted on Quadranet servers. It employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript and jQuery, and the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. SEO practices are good, with comprehensive metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status protections. However, it lacks several security headers and does not provide explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, and privacy compliance is minimal due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. The domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with the nature of a UN-affiliated non-profit. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional in its presentation and content but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security headers, and explicit contact information to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forsafeworship.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a UN-backed non-profit initiative focused on safeguarding religious sites globally, leveraging the authority and credibility of the United Nations Alliance of Civilizations. Its competitive advantage lies in its official UN affiliation and focus on peace and religious harmony. The business model is advocacy and awareness, targeting governments, religious communities, and civil society. Revenue streams are likely grant or UN funding based, with no commercial activities evident. The partnership ecosystem includes social media channels for outreach but no explicit commercial partners. Growth indicators are aligned with global peace initiatives and UN campaigns. Strategic observations suggest a focus on content quality and outreach rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain status protections are in place, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms exist. Data protection practices are not explicitly detailed, and GDPR compliance is not demonstrated through policy documents. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data via forms on the homepage, reducing immediate risk. Overall, the security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
United Nations Alliance of Civilizations (UNAOC)
Description
Religious sites are symbols of our history, traditions, and humanity in every country and community across the globe. They must be respected as places of peace and harmony where worshippers and visitors can feel safe.
Key services
Advocacy, Awareness campaigns, UN Plan of Action dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Yoast SEO plugin, Divi Theme, 3D Flipbook plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited etc.

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a UN initiative focused on safeguarding religious sites globally
  2. Content is well structured with good SEO metadata and structured data
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
  8. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with non-profit usage
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with a popular theme (Divi) and SEO plugin (Yoast), indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. Hosting on Quadranet suggests reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses standard web technologies including JavaScript and jQuery. However, there is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. Accessibility is basic, and SEO is well addressed through metadata and structured data. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and privacy compliance need attention to reduce risks and align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forsafeworship.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forsafeworship.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.