Skip to main content

Security report for formulare-uradu.cz

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching formulare-uradu.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QCM s.r.o. positions itself as a key provider of electronic form services for Czech municipal governments, addressing a niche but essential market need for digital government-citizen communication. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its compliance with Czech digital service laws and ease of use for both citizens and offices. Revenue likely derives from service subscriptions or usage fees by municipal offices. The target customers are local government entities and Czech citizens requiring official forms. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with related portals under the QCM brand, enhancing its market reach. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active content updates. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding service offerings and improving compliance to capture more government contracts.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and avoids obvious data exposure but lacks critical security headers and formal incident response information. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the HTML content, but the absence of security.txt and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent and limited privacy policy detail. Incident response readiness is unclear, and no dedicated security contact channels were found. The security culture appears basic, with some use of GDPR-related plugins but no advanced security frameworks or certifications evident.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner and enhance the privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and user data rights.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish clear incident response procedures and publish contact channels for security issues to build trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
QCM s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
QCM s.r.o.
Description
Portál formuláře úřadů je systém pro elektronickou komunikaci s úřady, umožňující občanům podávat žádosti a formuláře elektronicky bez nutnosti návštěvy úřadu.
Key services
Elektronické formuláře pro úřady, Registrace a správa účtů pro úřady, Seznam úřadů a jejich formulářů
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, WooCommerce 7.1.0, jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap 4.1.0, Ultimate Member plugin, Contact Form 7, TablePress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Ultimate Member with GDPR module)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Leady
Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based portal for electronic communication with Czech municipal offices.
  2. Content is in Czech language and targeted at Czech citizens and local government offices.
  3. No privacy or cookie banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Use of multiple third-party scripts including analytics and marketing tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Terms and privacy policy are present but privacy policy is basic and lacks explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  8. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with no visible SSL issues.
  10. No security headers detected in the HTML content; may require further server header analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with formulare-uradu.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review formulare-uradu.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.