Skip to main content

Security report for formcycle.eu

XIMA MEDIA GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

formcycle, a product of XIMA MEDIA GmbH, is a professional and flexible web-based platform specializing in digital form and process management. The company offers a low-code solution enabling users to create, configure, and process digital forms and workflows efficiently, supporting both cloud and on-premises deployments. Their market position is that of a niche technology provider focused on ease of use and customization without complex programming. The website is well-structured, bilingual (English and German), and targets businesses seeking digital transformation of form and workflow processes. Technically, the website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS and leverages modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Typed.js. It integrates Matomo for analytics and Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility features, although some improvements in accessibility could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses consent management for cookies, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common and justified for this business type, and the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the company's German base. Overall, formcycle presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid technical foundation and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching formcycle.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

formcycle operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS and on-premises software solutions for form and workflow management. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a low-code platform that simplifies digital process automation for businesses. The company targets medium-sized enterprises and organizations requiring customizable digital forms and workflows. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, cloud subscriptions, and consulting services. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses modern marketing and analytics tools, indicating a growth-oriented approach. Partnerships or subsidiaries were not identified, suggesting a focused business model. The website content and structure support a professional brand image and clear communication of product benefits.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to high security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent via Usercentrics. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-friendly tracking. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation to meet best practices and compliance standards fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to enhance transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to prevent vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Maintain and document data retention and privacy policies aligned with GDPR and other relevant regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
XIMA MEDIA GmbH
Description
formcycle is a professional, flexible, web-based platform for form and process management, offering digital form creation, management, and processing in a single solution. It supports cloud and on-premises deployment and is a low-code platform enabling customization without complex programming.
Key services
Online form builder, Workflow designer, Inbox for process data handling, form.CLOUD SaaS offering, Consulting and installation support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Contao Open Source CMS, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Typed.js, Matomo Analytics, Usercentrics Consent Management, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Contao CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in English and German.
  3. Strong focus on low-code form and workflow management solutions.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected in HTML.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant visibility.
  7. Social media presence on major platforms supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao CMS platform, utilizing a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, and Typed.js for interactive UI elements. It integrates Matomo for analytics and Usercentrics for consent management, reflecting a mature approach to privacy and user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility. No hosting provider details were identified from the HTML content. The technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but could be improved by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with formcycle.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review formcycle.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.