Skip to main content

Security report for forestradar.com

ForestRadar · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ForestRadar is a technology company specializing in advanced forest intelligence through the use of machine learning and satellite imagery. Their offerings include a suite of products such as Compute Cloud for Earth Observation, forest and agriculture monitoring apps, and specialized services for flood and fire monitoring. The company targets forestry managers, environmental agencies, and enterprises requiring precise environmental monitoring solutions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and mobile optimization, supporting a small-sized business profile focused on niche environmental technology services. Technically, the site uses modern web standards with ES modules and CSS, though no CMS or hosting details are evident. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forestradar.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ForestRadar operates in the technology sector with a focus on environmental monitoring and forest intelligence. Their business model revolves around providing SaaS and data services leveraging satellite data and machine learning. The company appears to be a small, specialized player with a clear market niche. They maintain active social media profiles on Facebook and LinkedIn, which supports their market presence. The lack of published privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated from the website content. The product portfolio is diverse within the environmental monitoring domain, indicating a strategy to serve multiple related market segments such as forestry, agriculture, and infrastructure monitoring.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS as indicated by URLs, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. Forms are present with required fields, but no advanced security or privacy notices are published. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add an incident response contact email and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features and conduct an accessibility audit to improve inclusiveness.
  5. Consider integrating analytics with privacy-respecting configurations and disclose data collection practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ForestRadar
Description
ForestRadar provides a weekly alert service to secure forests using machine learning and satellite imagery. They offer integrated Earth Observation platforms, forest monitoring apps, agriculture apps, cloud-free satellite basemaps, flood and fire monitoring services.
Key services
Compute Cloud platform for Earth Observation, Forest Monitoring App, Agriculture App with Sentinel-2 imagery, Cloud-free Sentinel-2 basemap, Flood Monitoring App, Fire Monitoring App
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript ES Modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • Secure form with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and contact form.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is linked.
  5. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. No certifications or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present.
  7. Technical implementation uses modern HTML and JavaScript modules with CSS.
  8. No analytics or advertising/tracking scripts detected.
  9. Website is well structured with clear navigation and good mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript ES modules, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The site loads CSS asynchronously and uses modulepreload for JavaScript, which suggests performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, which reduces tracking footprint but also limits marketing insights. Hosting provider and server details are not available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forestradar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forestradar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.