Skip to main content

Security report for forcedfemdom.com

ForcedFemdom.com · Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ForcedFemdom.com operates as a niche adult content toplist website specializing in female domination and related fetishes. The site aggregates and ranks various adult sites, providing affiliate links and advertising opportunities. The business model is primarily affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector, targeting an adults-only audience. The domain is long-established since 2001, indicating a stable presence in this niche market. Technical infrastructure is basic, relying on standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without advanced frameworks or CMS. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks modern security enhancements such as DNSSEC and security headers. Security posture is moderate with some best practices like domain transfer protection and compliance statements, but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forcedfemdom.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a niche position as a toplist aggregator for female domination adult sites, leveraging affiliate marketing revenue streams. It maintains partnerships with multiple adult content domains and networks, enhancing its reach within the adult entertainment ecosystem. The business targets mature adults interested in femdom and BDSM content. The lack of explicit company contact details and limited transparency reduces business credibility. The site’s long domain age supports its market presence, but the absence of modern compliance and security measures may hinder growth and trust. Advertising is conducted via third-party adult ad networks, and the site uses JavaScript-based tracking for user data collection. Strategic partnerships with related adult sites strengthen its affiliate marketing model.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) but lacks DNSSEC and common security headers, which are critical for preventing DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site includes an abuse contact page, which is a positive incident response indicator. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the content. The JavaScript includes tracking calls but no advanced analytics or security frameworks. Overall, the site should improve security headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish privacy and cookie policies to enhance compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security and business contacts beyond abuse page.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ForcedFemdom.com
Description
The ranking list of quality female domination sites.
Key services
ranking and linking to female domination adult sites, affiliate referrals, advertising adult content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • 18 USC 2257 compliance statement

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
alt.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a toplist aggregator for female domination adult sites.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating poor privacy compliance.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found; only abuse contact page.
  4. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled; moderate security posture.
  5. Content is adult NSFW with explicit keywords and affiliate marketing links.
  6. Website uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with some tracking calls.
  7. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected.
  8. Domain is old and consistent with niche adult content business.
  9. Advertising via alt.com iframe banner detected.
  10. No social media or structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It does not appear to use a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices but limited accessibility features. The site relies on affiliate marketing links and third-party ad networks for monetization. Tracking is done via custom JavaScript XMLHttpRequest calls. The domain is registered with NameSilo, LLC and has a long history consistent with the business niche. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or cloud infrastructure. Technical debt is moderate due to lack of modern security and privacy features. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security posture, and enhance compliance with privacy regulations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forcedfemdom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forcedfemdom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.