Skip to main content

Security report for forarch-poradenskacentra.cz

ABF a.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOR ARCH Poradenská centra is a Czech Republic based advisory platform focused on architecture and construction consulting, supported by ABF a.s. and various government and professional partners. The website serves as an informational and event coordination hub, targeting architects, construction professionals, and related stakeholders. The platform demonstrates a solid market position with established partnerships and a consistent brand presence. Technically, the site uses a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 1.12.4, and Google Tag Manager, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, though outdated libraries and lack of security headers present moderate risks. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with a GDPR policy linked from a parent domain. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy with room for technical and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forarch-poradenskacentra.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention forarch-poradenskacentra.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for forarch-poradenskacentra.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the government and professional advisory sector, organizing architectural advisory centers and related events. Its revenue model likely includes event hosting, partnerships, and informational services. The company leverages a network of reputable partners including government ministries and professional chambers, enhancing its credibility and market reach. The target audience includes industry professionals and the general public interested in architecture. The company is medium-sized, founded in 2017, and operates under ABF a.s. The partnership ecosystem is strong, supporting the business model and market positioning. Growth indicators include ongoing event scheduling and active partner engagement.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4) introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or security policies are published, limiting transparency. No visible exposed sensitive data or critical vulnerabilities were detected. The site lacks a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file, which could improve security culture and incident handling. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish explicit terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve legal clarity and security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel to improve readiness and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABF a.s.
Description
FOR ARCH Poradenská centra is a platform providing advisory centers related to architecture and construction, supported by various professional partners and government entities.
Key services
Advisory centers for architecture and construction, Information dissemination, Event hosting and coordination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap 3.3.7, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Socket.io 2.1.1, Google Tag Manager, LightGallery, FullCalendar, Bootstrap Datetimepicker
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with consistent branding.
  2. Content is focused on architectural advisory centers and related events.
  3. Multiple reputable partners and government entities are linked.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only newsletter subscription form.
  6. Uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but includes outdated jQuery version.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 1.12.4, indicating some technical debt due to outdated libraries. The presence of Google Tag Manager and cookie consent scripts shows awareness of analytics and privacy requirements. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of CSS and JS assets. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The hosting appears stable, likely managed by ABF a.s. or related infrastructure. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forarch-poradenskacentra.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forarch-poradenskacentra.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.